
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:For some reason the wines of the Languedoc have never really caught on (around here anyway). I think that they require too much hand selling. People do not know the wines, and so tend to shy away unless coaxed.
JC (NC)
Lifelong Learner
6679
Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:23 pm
Fayetteville, NC
JC (NC) wrote: southern Rhone or Southern France.
Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:I think Languedoc/Provence is an excellent idea! Should be some nice wines out there to choose from. This way, I can draw from my cellar and clear some room for new vintages coming up.
Robin Garr wrote:Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:I think Languedoc/Provence is an excellent idea! Should be some nice wines out there to choose from. This way, I can draw from my cellar and clear some room for new vintages coming up.
Well, I like it a lot - particularly with the understanding that Provence includes the Southern Rhone - but I don't want to be the dictator. Any other comments before we declare it the winner?
I'm also happy with "A World of Pinot Noir" for spring, as suggested above ...
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:I was thinking of S Rhone just now and not sure about its inclusion. Languedoc and Roussillon cum Provence is a very wide area, including this area to the north will dilute the subject I think?
As an aside, I am a big fan of wines from Vin de Pays d’Oc, in the Languedoc region. Some good bargains here, all well researched by pundits such as Rosemary George and Jamie Goode, plus others.
David M. Bueker wrote:Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:I was thinking of S Rhone just now and not sure about its inclusion. Languedoc and Roussillon cum Provence is a very wide area, including this area to the north will dilute the subject I think?
As an aside, I am a big fan of wines from Vin de Pays d’Oc, in the Languedoc region. Some good bargains here, all well researched by pundits such as Rosemary George and Jamie Goode, plus others.
I bolded the selected statement because it hits on a point - the wines are well researched by people who have routine access to them.
I'm fine with excluding the Southern Rhone (expect me to report on Bandol - I presume we are not including Cahors) if that's what the group wants though.
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:My point has to do with market access. 99% of the wines from Languedoc/Roussilon that show up in wine shops in the USA are Red Bicyclette crap. Most of the rest of Rosé which is clearly suited to a time when we don't have 4 feet of snow on the ground.
Alejandro Audisio
Ultra geek
376
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:03 am
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Robin Garr wrote:David M. Bueker wrote:My point has to do with market access. 99% of the wines from Languedoc/Roussilon that show up in wine shops in the USA are Red Bicyclette crap. Most of the rest of Rosé which is clearly suited to a time when we don't have 4 feet of snow on the ground.
You don't get any serious Coteaux du Languedoc, Pic Saint Loup, Minervois and their neighbors? I'm surprised.
Also, why are people taking the Southern Rhone out of Provence? Ask anybody in Avignon whether they're in Provence or not and they'll go "oui."
Maybe I'm wrong, but I had the impression that Languedoc and Provence, defined as the administrative regions, cover the entire South inclusive of both Roussillon and the Rhone below Montelimar - Provence east from the Rhone to Italy, and Languedoc west from the Rhone to Spain. Am I offbase about this, or are we talking at cross purposes, administrative regions vs the more complicated map of AOCs?
Tim York wrote:Robin, you are correct that if you take the French administrative provinces of Languedoc-Roussillon and Provence-Côtes d'Azur, you take in all the Languedoc, Roussillon and Provence appellations as well as most but not all of the areas covered by southern Côtes du Rhône appellation. However, I don't think that administrative boundaries are very helpful in distinguishing wine character boundaries; for example most, if not all, the southern Côtes du Rhône right bank areas are in Languedoc-Roussilon as are those of Costières de Nîmes, commonly considered Rhône wine. All my French reference books consider Provençal wines separately from those of the Rhône and I was rightly criticised by Victor de la Serna for vinously and culturally assimilating Roussillon (very Catalan) with Languedoc just because of administrative boundaries.
My reticence about the inclusion of Rhône is that it would be likely to take up the majority of posts just because of easy availability when it would rewarding to encourage people to increase familiarity with the diversity of quality offerings from Languedoc-Roussillon and the rest of Provence-Côtes d'Azur. Frankly I am shocked if, in a sophisticated part of the USA like Connecticut, the offer for these wines is as poor as David says.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, Dale Williams and 4 guests