The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4979

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

by Tim York » Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:22 am

Côtes du Rhône Villages Rasteau 2001 – Domaine Gourt de Mautens, Jérôme Bressy – Alc.14% - (>€30 for current vintage). Varietal composition of the red vines planted is “70% Grenache, 30% vieux Carignan, mourvèdre, Syrah, counoise, muscardin et vaccarèse; les vignes sont âgées de 45 à 90 ans pour les 2/3 d’entre elles et de 5 à 30 ans pour le reste”.

When Jérôme Bressy burst onto the scene in the second half of the 90s, the power and richness his red caused a stir and gave rise to a lot of hype. At the time I thought them impressive but too spoofy and brash to appeal to me in their youth but bought some bottles of vintages from 1998 to 2001 in the hope that moderate ageing would turn them into something civilised and harmonious. I haven’t yet tried the 2000 but found the 1998 and 1999 at c.10 years rich and complex wines but with a tendency to cloy after a glass or two. I note that leading French guides still praise this estate to the skies though recognising that Bressy has refined his style since the early 00s; if true, a good thing IMHO.

This was my first bottle of the 2001. The cork was moist right to the top and the bottle was beginning to leak though the level was still quite good.
C: Not quite so deep as my memory of the 98 and 99 with little signs of bricking at the rim.
N: Very subdued with the most noticeable odour being of cheesy eggs which immediately made me think reduction (but from a leaky bottle??).
P: Big, full bodied, quite dark in flavour showing sweet dark rose and old book notes with little primary fruit, fair acidity and firm but quite fine tannins supporting the finish. This was less spectacular in richness and, by the same token, less cloying than the 98 and 99 but showed more signs of drying out and age (9 years old) than I remember with them; 15/20+ (averaging interesting palate and poor nose).

So I remain underwhelmed by Gourt de Mautens, particularly considering its price point, and prefer, for example, the much more harmonious but much less hyped and pricey Haut-Coustias and Prestige Cairanne of similar age from Oratoire Saint-Martin.
Tim York
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36366

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

by David M. Bueker » Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:00 am

Having had young and old bottles of the '98, '00 and '01 I will say that I do not like this wine with any age on it.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10904

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:58 am

Does not sound like a wine for me! Tim appreciate your TN however.

(By the way Tim, on another subject, rain in parts of the Loire seem to be a problem?).
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4979

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

by Tim York » Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:50 pm

Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:(By the way Tim, on another subject, rain in parts of the Loire seem to be a problem?).


Indeed. I saw Jim's report. The weather broke all over NW Europe on Thursday with lots of rain. It's continuing here but judging by the weather radar Touraine seems to have largely escaped today and the forecast for tomorrow looks dry with some wind, which Jim says they need to dry the grapes. So lets not despair yet.
Tim York
no avatar
User

Frank Drew

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

74

Joined

Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:14 pm

Location

Virginia

Re: WTN: I don't get Gourt de Mautens; the 2001.

by Frank Drew » Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:03 pm

Tim

I agree about the 1998, which I found mouth-numbingly tannic; I think I've bought a bottle of the '00 or '01, thinking maybe he'd toned things down, but haven't tried it yet.

The wine reminds me of the Santa Duc Gigondas from 1989 and 1990, which years later still show really ripe fruit and nice flavors, but the tannins are simply too grippy for my tastes.
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8372

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Yup....

by TomHill » Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:05 am

I'm with you on Gourt. When they first hit, they were huge/extracted Grenache wines that everyone thought would really age
into something great. When they start to drop fruit, there's not much left but big tannins. I, too, am underwhelmed.
Especially for the $$'s.
Tom

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign