The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Hoke

Rank

Achieving Wine Immortality

Posts

11420

Joined

Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am

Location

Portland, OR

WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

by Hoke » Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:53 pm

If you are seeking to understand the concept of terroir, that can be done through a tasting of the Single Vineyard Pinot Noirs of St. Innocent.

I had the occasion to do just that recently, through two tastings in very close proximity, and it was one of the more intriguing and intellectually edifying wine learning experiences I've ever engaged in.

The first tasting was at dinner. My wife and I had decided to go to the Pearl District in Portland, where there is an abundance of fine restaurants. I realized then that she had never been to 1001 Restaurant, one of the better ones, and it was time to remedy that lapse. We were seated in the somewhat quieter upstairs section with its charming views of the district, hurried streets below and still vistas of old buildings mingled with new, and the bridges of Portland at a further distance.

The decor is spare and elegant in 1001, and the staff has that unique combination you can see nowhere else, a blend of consummate training and attentiveness with the casual ease and genuine warmth of Portland.

We had a wonderful dinner, but the point of this story is St. Innocent, so we'll focus on that. By the time our main courses arrived, with the usual division of a delicate fish dish for her and a heartier meat dish for me, we had to make a decision about wine. 1001 has an excellent wine list, so the choice was not easy, but once I spotted a half bottle of the St. Innocent Shea Vineyard Pinot Noir 2008 at a very reasonable price, and was reassured by the sommelier it was not infanticide to consume it, I decided that would be the wine.

The Shea was brilliant! A perfect example of the best style of Willamette Valley Pinot Noir from a good location in the hands of a perceptive and light-handed winemaker, it was not only exuberant with dense, dark cherry, it had a solid earthy middle-palate and a wisp of lingering spice at the finish. And what's more, it immediately conformed itself to the food in the most delightful way, light and fruity enough with the halibut to show the highlights of the dish, and rich and meaty enough with the pork to support and compliment it perfectly. Few red wines can do that easily and well; for good Pinot Noir, it's easy.

This was a case where the wine--specifically the wine---made the meal.

Fast forward a week and serendipity takes a hand. I received word that the Oregon distributor, Lemma Wine Company, was holding a double tasting of new Austrian wines and the new releases of St. Innocent Pinot Noirs. I decided I had to be there.

Came the day and, suitably lubricated with the new additions to the Austrian lineup from Winebow (which were pretty impressive in themselves), I stepped over to taste the St. Innocent with the winemaker/president, Mark Vlossak.

Mark had on display the 2008 releases of St. Innocent Pinot Noir Villages Cuvee Willamette Valley; Temperance Hill Vineyard, Eola-Amity; Momtazi Vineyard, McMinnville; and Freedom Hill Vineyard, Willamette Valley.

Pinot Noir Villages Cuvee is very much in a 'Burgundian villages' style, and also very much a specific intent to combine younger vines with some older, more established vines to achieve maximum effect. The source of the Villages Cuvee is the Vitae Springs Vineyard in the south Salem hills, but it is a combination, a melding of older, more mature vines and other younger vines from other vineyards where plantings were done to replace phylloxerated vines.

This is smart husbandry of both the vines and the St. Innocent 'brand', for it allows use of the younger vines in a stable cuvee release, while keeping the inherent terroir of the single vineyards intact.

The grapes were fermented in stainless steel barrels after two days of cold maceration; the wine was aged for 12 months in in French oak barrels (only 20% new), and bottled without fining or filtration in November 2009. The wine is sturdy, and pleasant, and in the style of the Willamette Valley, with the hallmarks of red fruits, pie spices and mushroomy, earthy undertones. A case or two would not be remiss in the cellar of a collector, to serve as a reliable Oregonian standard.

But the Villages Cuvee is more about the regional terroir, more about being a general statement of what the entire Willamette Valley Pinot Noir is, for it is a conscious blend of old and young vines, more than an expression of a specific place. For that, you have to go to the Single Estates that Vlossak produces.

The Single Estate Pinot Noirs


Temperance Hill Vineyard is located in the Eola-Amity AVA in a volcanic uplift, with well-aged vines firmly rooted in weathered basaltic soils. Those soils translate through the Pinot clones used as both bright, fresh red fruit and a perceptive minerality. It's red cherry versus black here, with a tart/sweet strawberry, bright and lively and firm with acidity, and impressive purity---and intensity--- of flavor. But there's an intriguing smokiness too; so evident that Vlossak cites it as his favorite wine with grilled meats.

Momtazi Vineyard is located west of McMinnville on a steep hillside, with younger vines than Temperance Hill. It is also warmer, with more wind effect, and has a 'roasted slope' effect on the Pinot Noir struggling in the thin volcanic soils.

The Momtazi, it is immediately and dramatically apparent, is as different from Temperance Hill as any two wines could be. Same harvest; same winemaker; similar yields; and similar treatment post harvest by Vlossak. But these are inescapably two different Pinot Noirs.

Where the Temperance Hill was outgoing and exuberant in its youthfulness, the Momtazi is almost sullen and shy and unrevealing. There is indeed an almost Cote Rotie-like element to the wine, a stubborn, dark-fruited, roasted blackberry/marionberry and totally unexpected cassis. Where the Temperance Hill was sweet pie spices, the Momtazi is---again, roasted---Indian and Asian spices, mysterious and tantalizing. Where the Temperance Hill was free and easy with its fruit, the Momtazi is tight and unyielding (not to belabor the point, but very much like a young northern Rhone syrah would be.) The Momtazi demands patience, and its dense, compacted, slow-yielding nature would reveal itself only with years of quiet cellaring, I think. And in its maturity, it will be magnificent.

But we aren't finished yet.

The final wine, the Freedom Hill Vineyard, is from vines planted in 2004, to replace the original lot which succumbed to phylloxera that same year. Thus, this "new" Freedom Hill is from younger vines than previous vintage releases, but is more closely designed to suit the cold, westerly and windblown location through careful clonal and rootstock selection.

And again, the Freedom Hill is as different from the Momtazi as you could imagine. It is somewhat more akin to the Temperance Hill---but not really, for while the two share an exuberance of friendly, warm fruit at an early age, there is also that brooding character of the Momtazi that is not apparent in the Temperance Hill.

The singular characteristic that distinguishes the Freedom Hill Pinot Noir is its amazing intensity. Everything is more intense in this wine: the fruit is black, black cherry, almost a brandy-marinated black cherry. But the lean, intense line of mineralic acidity and the surprising strong tannins are in keeping with the massive fruitiness, and keep it from seeming unbalanced.

Simply put, everything is large in this wine, but it's all large in the right harmony and proportion. It is eminently drinkable, and thoroughly enjoyable now---but it would be a serious mistake to yield to temptation and guzzle it down now, for this wine will age into a truly heroic Pinot Noir. It will, I believe, go beyond, the Momtazi even; and the tannins, already softening now, will become supple and velvety soft, with that intense, rich black cherry fruit still startling in its flavor, but with an earthiness, a mushroomy, wet leaves, river bottom black soil quality that merely hints now but will emerge with time to complete the balance of the wine and bring it to its full force.

So here, counting the Shea tasted at 1001, but eliminating the Villages Cuvee as a winemaker's blend (but otherwise keeping it intact and in memory as a lovely Pinot Noir; simply not a single vineyard focus), we have four Single Vineyard expressions of Pinot Noir, all at the hands of the same winemaker---and that winemaker intent on allowing each site to express itself as much as possible. And the result is four entirely distinct and different wines, each a particular expression of Pinot Noir, but each unique and individual with its own very obvious identity.

If the three pillars of a great wine are the grape, the place, and the winemaker---and I firmly believe they are---we have one winemaker, one grape variety, and four singular sites within one climatic region. Yet we clearly have four different wines.

I'm content to let others argue micrometrically and infinitely about what terroir is and how it manifests itself, since that is apparently what makes them happy. I've tasted the St. Innocents, and my case is rested.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45469

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

by Jenise » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:09 pm

Where I would agree with you that within any given year Mark's wines provide such a lesson, I have to comment specifically on the Temperance Hill and report some confusion. I've been buying these on and off for about 15 years now, and I am TOTALLY confused about what to expect from the Temperance vineyard. The commonality exhibited by Mark's work in the Seven Springs Vineyard, the hard Pommard-ness of his Freedom Hills and the Shea-ness of his Shea Vineyard wines has never been evident to me in the Temperance wines. Some years they're giving and pie-spicey, as you report here, and some years they've been black-fruited with hard tannins. I don't know what gives, but if there's any way of averaging down the Temperance experience and feeling confident about what to expect from "a good one", I don't know what it is.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Hoke

Rank

Achieving Wine Immortality

Posts

11420

Joined

Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am

Location

Portland, OR

Re: WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

by Hoke » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:42 pm

Hmm.

I''m necessarily guessing here, and I am in now way qualified to reply with any sense of being an authority, but I'll still take a wag at this, Jenise.

The problem might be with the sourcing from within the Temperance Hill Vineyard, and what the makeup of the blend is.

Originally, Vlossak says, TH was composed of two separate blocks with the vineyard planted in 1984 and 1995. I would imagine the differences between these blocks might influence differences in the style of the wine, since they are, I believe, at slightly different elevations and facings.

To make things a bit more complicated, TH from St. Innocent also now include (since 2007) a third block, which is further subdivided by different rootstocks and clonal selections, planted with triple density of vines against previous plantings, and it sits on a sheltered hill (with again a different facing than the previous two blocks), right next to Bethel Heights Flat Block.

The other, and perhaps more primary influence here, is that this area has been widely affected by phylloxera, and as a result has been heavily replanted over the last several years. This is usually done in plots or blocks rather than an entire vineyard, so you'll get different results: younger vines, which don't show as much terroir (or as clearly, perhaps we should say), different clones, different rootstocks, and different density. Perhaps different canopy management as well? All that would have a tremendous effect on the resultant wines, I would think.

Jacques Puisais, the French Minister of Taste, and a great wine man, when commenting on terroir, said that it takes an least thirty years of a vineyard before you can even begin to discuss terroir.

What I get from Vlossak is that he focuses on getting good fruit from the vineyard, but then hopes to allow the fruit to express itself without too much mucking about from him. If you get different fruit, you get different expression.

So the last thought might be this: is Temperance Hill simply a highly variable site as compared to the others? Does it show the location (in that it is the coldest site, according to Vlossak) more from the influence of the vintage than perhaps the other two?

Two experiences to support this: 1. A vineyard I am familiar with in the Sonoma Coast area, which was friggin' COLD, would produce variable vintages largely dependent upon how cold it was, or wasn't, that year. And you could taste the difference. 2. With Mercurey, you often get a characteristic hardness and leanness, because Mercurey and much of the Chalonnaise is not protected from the steady easterly winds and is also flatter and more open and exposed than the more northerly Cote d'Or. I equate that hardness as being primarily the wind effect, and secondarily the coldness from lack of protection. (Of course we have to factor in the soil differences as well when comparing to the Cote d'Or.) But I believe its the wind/cold that has the primary effect. So once again it comes down to location, location, location. :D

Sorry, I'm babbling now. Does any of this make any sense? 8)
no avatar
User

Hoke

Rank

Achieving Wine Immortality

Posts

11420

Joined

Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am

Location

Portland, OR

Re: WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

by Hoke » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:45 pm

And another thing re TH:

According to a careful reading of Vlossak's notes (and my tasting experience, albeit more limited than I would like) he cites a distinct purity of fruit---cherry fruit---and a noticeable smoky character that he says is a characteristic of the vineyard, not barrels or other post-fermentation treatment, as being the two identifiable traits of TH.

(And if you are fortunate enough to have any of the TH 1990 hanging around, Vlossak says that is the best TH he has every made. He hasn't commented on the 2008 yet; although he does love the vintage.)
no avatar
User

James Dietz

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1236

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm

Location

Orange County, California

Re: WTN: St. Innocent SV Pinot Noirs: A Study in Terroir

by James Dietz » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:57 pm

Great write-up.. I'm grabbing an SI before I head to the pool..
Cheers, Jim

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Apple Bot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google [Bot], TikTok and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign