by Brian K Miller » Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:58 am
The 2004 wines do tend to be richer and heavier and more alcoholic due to the hot year (hence the higher "ratings"). However, there are 2004 wines that do show some balance, with good acid and even elegance. Try Clos Du Val or Freemark Abbey.
I've only tried a Rudd wine once (a 2003) and it did not thrill me (especially for the price) so this may be the fault of the winemaker, not the vintage or "Napa" per se.

...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach