by Anders Källberg » Sun Aug 22, 2010 2:26 pm
Salil: Sorry for late reply, but I have been both busy from work and tired from a nasty cold - not the best conditions for writing notes here. I still have the ambition to post my notes from, at least, the tasting with Alexander Adam, and, hopefully, also the other 11 visits during our wine walking week, mostly in the Saar.
Anyway, regarding the 2009 Spätlese, I think it simply could described as made in the same mould as the Kabinett, though, as expected, of course fuller, with sweeter, riper fruit and with impressions of sweet peaches, honey and linden-blossom. A lovely acidity was playing with the sweetness in the mouth in a lovely way together with a little spiciness. The aftertaste maybe a bit on the sweeter side, but with the fine acidity there to balance the impression of sweetness. Regarding Otto's comment about a bit lowish acidity, I must object. After all this wine has 8.6 g/l if acidity, which is a bit hard to regard as low, in my opinion, but I also agree with David's comment regarding the comparison with the 2008 Spätlese. Although I haven't tasted it, I have enough experience of comparing the two vintages 2008 and 2009 to imagine how it could have been. 2008 is a leaner vintage, or "classical" if you want, with less ripe fruit and even more pronounced acidity, which I could imagine would be more to Otto's preference. Personally, for drinking while these two vintages are still young, I prefer the lovely, seductive fruit of 2009. It simply makes the wines soo charming and delicious!
BTW, the amount of sugar in the Spätlese is 95 g/l, not too much higher than the Kabinett which weighs in at 70 g/l.
And, yes, we were treated with a preview of both the Grosses Gewächse Goldtröpfchen and Hofberg from 2009 and both were splendid. I'll put writing notes from those high up on my to-do list.
/Anders