The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Back online

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

David Lole

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1433

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:49 am

Location

Canberra, Australia

Back online

by David Lole » Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:26 pm

Having not had more than cursory access to a computer for well over a month now, I bit the bullet a week and a bit ago and, with the help of a good friend, bought one. Since last month's Merimbula Jazz Festival, I've been working through a number of my cellar's forgotten heroes, along with some recent purchases and, to date, not one dud has passed my lips. Probably the worst rated wine was a 2000 Denis Mortet Lavaux-St-Jacques (85), a good wine only marred by some chronic overoaking.

Some of the highlights to date have been -

Henschke Mt Edelstone 1995
Wynn's John Riddoch 1984
Louis Carillon Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrieres 1997
Kay's Amery McLaren Vale Cabernet Shiraz 1971
Henschke Cyril Henschke Cabernet Sauvignon 1984
Ch. Langoa-Barton 1985
Lindeman's Coonawarra Nursery Vineyard Riesling 1985
Hugel Gewurtztraminer VT 1989
Deletang Montlouis Grande Reserve Tris Les Batisses 1990
Mount Horrocks Riesling 2002
Trimbach Clos St. Hune Riesling 1992

The Henschke's were both stunning - the '95 Mt Ed. (93) utterly beguiling, revealing an uncanny balance between youthful vibrancy and sublime maturity. The '84 Cyril (96) akin to an angel weeping on your tongue with such silky elegance and profound complexity. I almost shed tears when we cracked this blinder. The Lindy's 85 Nursery Riesling (95) is an utter freak of nature. At age 25 it's only reached it's zenith. Similarly-stored and preserved bottles should last at least another 5 years. This was a minimally-ullaged Lindeman's Classic release that went straight into Anders Josephson's storage facility for many years thereafter. What can you say about Trimbach's super-premium Clos-St.-Hune? Utterly beguiling and elegant with such brilliant delineation, freshness of fruit and mouth-watering minerality. 94 points. The Hugel 1989 late-picked Gewurtz is no slouch either and, to my taste, only a meagre point below the CSH. I've drunk close to a dozen of the phenomenal Kay's 1971 Cabernet-Shiraz and not opened a bad bottle. Freakish wine, and in much better shape (bottle to bottle) than Grange of the same vintage! The Wynn's blew me away - still marvellously intact and drinking magnificently ... about 92 points and, yes, before I forget I must give the Mount Horrocks a huge rap. This is Clare at its finest and having drunk this over 72 hours with no degradation, I would give this another 10 years in the cellar before it peaks.

There are quite a few others I've opened that have impressed greatly, but alas, I'm out of time just now to report on them, and, no doubt, too many that have just blended into the fog of the recent past. Look forward to being online again to report on and discuss the sometimes wacky but mostly wonderful world of wine.
Cheers,

David
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36365

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Back online

by David M. Bueker » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:12 am

Welcome back David! I had no internet access all day Saturday and that nearly killed me. I can't imagine a month!
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Salil

Rank

Franc de Pied

Posts

2703

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Location

albany, ny

Re: Back online

by Salil » Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:03 am

This is why laptops are great! ;)

Good to see your notes as always. That '95 Edelstone really is a beauty, though eye-opening to see how long the old Cyrils are going.

Was the Mt. Horrocks the dry or the Cordon Cut?
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45469

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: Back online

by Jenise » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:21 am

"Like an angel weeping on your tongue"--fantastic imagery there, David. And you have been drinking very very well. Sure envy you those older bottles--most of us in the states have not had Ozzies older than the 90's, as the big push to import them (and support from the all-important Wine Spectator) didn't really start until the early 90's.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21919

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Back online

by Robin Garr » Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:34 pm

Salil wrote:This is why laptops are great! ;)

iPhone. When you just can't go another minute without your Internet/Email fix. ;)
no avatar
User

Anders Källberg

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

805

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:48 am

Location

Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Back online

by Anders Källberg » Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:49 pm

WB, David! So, you might show up in chat in a little while then?
See you,
Anders
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12044

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: Back online

by Dale Williams » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:01 pm

Welcome back, and thanks for notes!
An 88 Henschke Mt Edelstone might be my favorite all time Aussie (and I've had quite a few Granges). Carillon is a great producer, I'm not a 97 fan but producer trumps vintage. The only Mount Horrocks Riesling I've has is the Cut sweeties, which left me cold, but I like Clare drys and will look for this. CSH is.....CSH!
no avatar
User

Salil

Rank

Franc de Pied

Posts

2703

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Location

albany, ny

Re: Back online

by Salil » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:17 am

Dale Williams wrote:An 88 Henschke Mt Edelstone might be my favorite all time Aussie (and I've had quite a few Granges).

I've not had as much experience with Grange as you, but I've liked Edelstones (and other Henschke wines like Cyril) more than most of the Penfolds lineup - Grange/Bin 707 can be really stunning, but the few older Edelstones I've had showed an amazing lightness of touch and sense of finesse that set them apart.
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4979

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: Back online

by Tim York » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:12 am

I've read elsewhere paeans of praise for Mt.Edelstone 95. I have owned bottles of both 93 and 95 and didn't like either; I think that there are TNs somewhere in the archive. Perhaps they were too young; I have one 95 left and feel tempted to give it a whirl on the strength of these reports.
Tim York
no avatar
User

David Lole

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1433

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:49 am

Location

Canberra, Australia

Re: Back online

by David Lole » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:15 am

To Salil .... it was the dry Riesling. Mt Horrocks is Stephanie Toole's winery.

Tried to get into chat this morning but somehow couldn't get java to work.

Tim, the '95 was pretty tough going early on. Has blossomed in the last several years. Give it a whirl. I don't think it'll get much better.
Cheers,

David
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36365

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Back online

by David M. Bueker » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:19 am

David - the current version of Firefox does not like Java at all. Not sure if that was your problem, but figured I would mention it.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

James Roscoe

Rank

Chat Prince

Posts

11069

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:43 pm

Location

D.C. Metro Area - Maryland

Re: Back online

by James Roscoe » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:20 pm

Good to see you around!
Yes, and how many deaths will it take 'til he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: Back online

by Bob Henrick » Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:09 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:David - the current version of Firefox does not like Java at all. Not sure if that was your problem, but figured I would mention it.


David, I am running FF version 3.6.8, And Java has never been faster. It used to take forever to load, but now just a few seconds.
Bob Henrick

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign