The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12044

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Dale Williams » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:27 pm

A bit of a tense weekend, it's hard to be far away with an ill parent (we're going down at end of week). But routine is healing for me, and that includes taking notes on wine.

With skirt steak with a chipotle marinade, and a brocolli/chevre salad, the 2007 Rimbert "Les Travers de Marceau " St. Chinian. Pleasant medium bodied red, cherry and raspberry fruit with just a little bit of a jammy edge, but actually quite bright acidity. Light tannins, fresh, drinking well. B/B+

As an apertif, the 2007 Donnhoff Oberhauser Leistenberg Kabinett. Apples, citrus, flowers, great length, maybe a tad shut down on nose but otherwise generous. B++

With herbed lamb chops and squash, the 2006 Havens Bourriquot (Napa) from 375. A little reticent, opens with some time, big black fruit with a little tobacco leaf greenness, and just a hint of dung. As it open the fruit takes forefront, some medium tannins, good acids for Napa. B

With grilled chicken in tandoori spices and an eggplant/feta/olive salad, the 2007 Maximim Grunhauser (von Schubert) Riesling QbA (#32- do they make that many?). Tart lemonade, an herbal bitters note, serious acids. I really quite like this, but those looking for a sweet and easy QbA might be less enthused. Actually does very well with a difficult match. B/B+

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. 
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36364

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:12 am

Yes, they do make that many. And they are not alone in that regard.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9798

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Rahsaan » Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:54 am

As David said, Grunhaus makes a lot of wine. And is a fairly big estate for the top German producers, I forget the exact holding size but it's easily findable on the internet.

And If you look at the Grunhaus website you can see exactly how many wines they make. Lots of iterations of all the different categories. Much more than gets imported to the States. Plus, you can also buy ham from them!
no avatar
User

Keith M

Rank

Beer Explorer

Posts

1184

Joined

Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:25 am

Location

Finger Lakes, New York

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Keith M » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:31 am

Rahsaan wrote:If you look at the Grunhaus website you can see exactly how many wines they make.

They also have a hectare planted with Auxerrois and Weissburgunder and another hectare of Spätburgunder. All on the estate.
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12044

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Dale Williams » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:14 pm

Rahsaan wrote:And If you look at the Grunhaus website you can see exactly how many wines they make.


I knew they made a lot of different wines, but not that many. I count 24 2009s, and that doesn't count things like auction wines or whatever else sold out. Lots of stuff you never see in States- liter QbAs (unsure if that's a separate AP), Weissburgunder, Sekt, etc.
no avatar
User

Keith M

Rank

Beer Explorer

Posts

1184

Joined

Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:25 am

Location

Finger Lakes, New York

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Keith M » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:48 pm

Dale Williams wrote:I count 24 2009s, and that doesn't count things like auction wines or whatever else sold out.

I didn't jot it down, so I'm depending on my memory here, but I think Carl von Schubert indicated that there were something like 50 or so different bottlings in a good year, with all the different fuder-designated stuff.
no avatar
User

Michael K

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

570

Joined

Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:13 pm

Location

Wellesley, MA, USA

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Michael K » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:08 pm

Did you get the Havens on closeout? It's too bad that they went under as I liked their juice that that pricepoint. At the closeouts, it was sad to see it go at $6 per...as they say, quite the bit of blood letting.
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12044

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Dale Williams » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:28 pm

Michael K wrote:Did you get the Havens on closeout? It's too bad that they went under as I liked their juice that that pricepoint. At the closeouts, it was sad to see it go at $6 per...as they say, quite the bit of blood letting.


Yes, on closeout though I paid more than $6- something like $9 for the halves of Bourriquot and Hudson Syrah. $15-18 for full bottles. Regular Syrah was $7-9 for 750s, Merlot Reserve $13. But I've always liked the wines, even before closeout, though I thought they were stronger before Havens sold.
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9798

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Rahsaan » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:32 pm

I was just looking through one of my wine reference books and noticed land/production figures, which folks might find interesting for perspective.

Grunhaus has 31 hectares of land for approx. 180,000 bottles of wine per vintage.

In comparison:
Willi Schaefer: 4 hectares/32,000 bottles
Daniel Vollenweider: 4 hectares/28,000 bottles
Reinhold Haart: 7.5 hectares/50,000 bottles
Egon Muller: 15 hectares/80,000 bottles
JJ Prum: 22 hectares/180,000 bottles
Donnhoff: 20 hectares/140,000 bottles
no avatar
User

Mike Conner

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

161

Joined

Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:35 am

Location

Knoxville, TN

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Mike Conner » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:55 pm

Rahsaan wrote:Grunhaus has 31 hectares of land for approx. 180,000 bottles of wine per vintage.

In comparison:
Willi Schaefer: 4 hectares/32,000 bottles
Daniel Vollenweider: 4 hectares/28,000 bottles
Reinhold Haart: 7.5 hectares/50,000 bottles
Egon Muller: 15 hectares/80,000 bottles
JJ Prum: 22 hectares/180,000 bottles
Donnhoff: 20 hectares/140,000 bottles


I'm guessing the difference between Prum and Grunhaus (different amount of land but equal bottles produced) means Prum has more vines in production per hectare? I would presume both these properties wouldn't be too far off in how much fruit they generally harvest from their vines.


In search of the perfect QPR wine.... does it exist?
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12044

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Dale Williams » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:49 pm

Yes, a pretty wide difference in bottles per ha:
Max. Grunhaus 5,800 per ha
Willi Schaefer 8,000 bottles
Vollenweider: 7,000 bottles
Haart: 6.700 bottles
Egon Muller:5,300 bottles
Prum: 8,200 bottles
Donnhoff: 7,000 bottles
I assuming figures don't include unplanted land
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36364

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by David M. Bueker » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:53 pm

Quite a lot of Prum's land has recently gone through fleurbereinigung, and is thus younger vines. This leads to increased yields over some of the miniscule yields that come from ancient, ugrafted vines formerly in parts of the sites.

Grunhaus, as a monopole, does not have to go through vineyard restructurng and replanting. Their vine age is likely higher, resulting in reduced yields. They may also sell off some juice, but I do not know.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9798

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Rahsaan » Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:08 pm

The numbers I got came from Der Feinschmecker Wein Gourmet 2010, a German magazine that puts out a yearly supplement on the 800 best winemakers in the country. It is sitting on my shelf and was easy to reach, but I'm not sure how accurate it is. In particular, I wonder how much variation there is from year-to-year in terms of bottles produced.

But, it does give a sense of the relative sizes of the operations.
no avatar
User

Bill Hooper

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2001

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:46 am

Location

McMinnville, OR

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Bill Hooper » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:18 pm

Note also that the two lowest yielding wineries are in the Saar and Ruwer. In Germany it is also important to remember that a hectare is measured horizontally, without paying any attention to degree of steepness and therefore actual vineyard surface area (though we are mostly talking about very steep vineyards in this case), so it is more helpful to start with planting densities and measure yields as juice per vine.

Cheers,
Bill
Wein schenkt Freude
ITB paetrawine.com
no avatar
User

Mark S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1174

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:28 pm

Location

CNY

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Mark S » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:57 pm

Rahsaan wrote:I was just looking through one of my wine reference books and noticed land/production figures, which folks might find interesting for perspective.

Grunhaus has 31 hectares of land for approx. 180,000 bottles of wine per vintage.

In comparison:
Willi Schaefer: 4 hectares/32,000 bottles
Daniel Vollenweider: 4 hectares/28,000 bottles
Reinhold Haart: 7.5 hectares/50,000 bottles
Egon Muller: 15 hectares/80,000 bottles
JJ Prum: 22 hectares/180,000 bottles
Donnhoff: 20 hectares/140,000 bottles


Wow. Donnhoff's HUGE. No wonder I see their bottles everywhere.
no avatar
User

Bill Hooper

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2001

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:46 am

Location

McMinnville, OR

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Bill Hooper » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:02 am

Mark S wrote:
Rahsaan wrote:I was just looking through one of my wine reference books and noticed land/production figures, which folks might find interesting for perspective.

Grunhaus has 31 hectares of land for approx. 180,000 bottles of wine per vintage.

In comparison:
Willi Schaefer: 4 hectares/32,000 bottles
Daniel Vollenweider: 4 hectares/28,000 bottles
Reinhold Haart: 7.5 hectares/50,000 bottles
Egon Muller: 15 hectares/80,000 bottles
JJ Prum: 22 hectares/180,000 bottles
Donnhoff: 20 hectares/140,000 bottles


Wow. Donnhoff's HUGE. No wonder I see their bottles everywhere.


Maybe you´re being sarcastic (I can never tell on the internet), but I wouldn´t call 12 000 cases huge even by German standards.

Cheers,
Bill
Wein schenkt Freude
ITB paetrawine.com
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36364

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by David M. Bueker » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:33 am

Helmut Donnhoff has been rather aggressive in buying land over the last several years.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Andrew Burge

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

175

Joined

Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:21 am

Location

Brisbane Australia

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Andrew Burge » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:14 am

Also remember with Donnhoff that one of Helmut's goals was to have a wide variety of sites within the Nahe which he now has - 8 of them separated across the whole river. Was Kreuznacher Krotenpfuhl the last acquisition - that was 5 years ago?

I agree, even 20ha is small.

To add two more - Schloss Lieser is 9.5ha and Fritz Haag is about 16.
Last edited by Andrew Burge on Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
no avatar
User

Salil

Rank

Franc de Pied

Posts

2703

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Location

albany, ny

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Salil » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:16 am

Andrew Burge wrote:Also remember with Donnhoff that oen of Helmut's goals was to have a wide variety of sites within the Nahe which he now has - 8 of them separated across the whole river.

Though according to the Theise catalog, Donnhoff has given up his holdings in Schlossbockelheimer Kupfergrube (to the Gutshermannsberg) for more land in the Hermannshohle.
no avatar
User

Andrew Burge

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

175

Joined

Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:21 am

Location

Brisbane Australia

Re: WTN: Napa, Nahe, Ruwer, and Languedoc

by Andrew Burge » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:17 am

Salil wrote:
Andrew Burge wrote:Also remember with Donnhoff that oen of Helmut's goals was to have a wide variety of sites within the Nahe which he now has - 8 of them separated across the whole river.

Though according to the Theise catalog, Donnhoff has given up his holdings in Schlossbockelheimer Kupfergrube (to the Gutshermannsberg) for more land in the Hermannshohle.


That's true of course. I was there last week (yes all the way from Aus - in fact only arrived home twenty hours ago) and they mentioned this land swap.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign