This may interest some, particularly those that haven't researched it before (sorry to those that know it already).
I recently picked up an alcohol testing device. I hadn't bothered before, as what was available until fairly recently was a bunch of unreliabe instruments that wouldn't give the same reading twice running, so they were at most a mental placebo to make ytou feel better about maybe being OK to drive home after that tasting or dinner.
Recently, there have been some very decent fuel cell (similar to the police units) instruments released, and an article in Wired magazine prompted me to take the plunge. The article is here, for those interested:
http://www.wired.com/reviews/product/pr_roundup_breathalyzersI picked up the BACTrack S80 Pro which was available in Canada and was a few bucks less than the other best unit in the comparison test. It reads about 0.001 low, but as long as you remember that, it is consistent.
Being of scientific bent, I immediately set up a test of the new machine, consisting of me, a bottle of 14% Cabernet, and a TV set to keep my amused between readings.
First, I drank 1/2 boittle over 1/2 hour, and then waited for 20 minutes (the machine says to do that) before measuring. Result, 0.025 Not much, you say? Ah, but what I had imbibed wasn't all into the bloodstream yet.
I then proceeded to finish the other half of the bottle over the next half hour, making a whole bottle in about 1.5 hours, probably the same amnount but in a bit shorter time than I would in a long wine lunch.
The readings:
20 min. 0.049 This was my highest reading and even if you bump it to 0.059 it was still legal to drive in many areas (we are limited to .08 here and throughout the US, although some areas in Europe with stricter limits).
40 min. .040
60 min. .033
120 min. .023
I took readings every 10 minutes, but I only include a few here - you can see the trend.
PLEASE note that intake vs. BAC is a personal thing dependent on blood volume and body size, and that I am 'generousl;y proportioned'. Many, perhaps most regular sized people would probably be blitzed and well over the legal limit before they finished a bottle of wine in the same time.
Do NOT take this to mean that you could use this as a rule of thumb. DO use this as an incentive to consider buying your own meter if you often have to drive yourself to wine events, and test before going home. The tools are now available and they are reasonably priced compared to the consequences of erring and getting caught. The Bactrack I bought was about $225 and the AlcoMate AccuCell AL9000 closer to $300. But then what does that ticket and DUI charge end up costing.....
My results mean that for the most part, when I was going by the 'guess and hope' method, I was probably still OK to drive, but I think I'll be much happier knowing where I stand and being able to moderate drinking, wait awhile or take alternative transportation (all of which I've done in the past).
Hope this was of interest to some, but if it educated even one member into using one of these and driving more safely, I'll be happy. Finally, do not use these meters to tell you that you can drive if you don't feel up to driving. You may be tired, jet lagged, sick, run down, and a lower than legal reading may take the wind out of your sails to the point that even under the limit, you won't be able to drive alertly. Benefit of the doubt should always go to not driving.