Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
44984
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Ed Comstock wrote:Thanks! I don't know if this is bad or good, but now my excitement is propped up by optimism!
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
44984
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
AlexR wrote:I've had 1929 La Mission. It had held up marvellously.
28 and 29 were back-to-back great years.
I suggest using the Audouze method: uncork, pour a small glass, sample, and unless something seems seriously wrong, let the wine take advantage of that air space. Do not decant.
All the best,
Alex R.
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Jenise wrote:AlexR wrote:I've had 1929 La Mission. It had held up marvellously.
28 and 29 were back-to-back great years.
I suggest using the Audouze method: uncork, pour a small glass, sample, and unless something seems seriously wrong, let the wine take advantage of that air space. Do not decant.
All the best,
Alex R.
A '28 Pontet Canet was even better than that '29 Margaux--more optimism, Ed!
Sam Platt
I am Sam, Sam I am
2330
Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm
Indiana, USA
Mark Lipton wrote:But the caveat that there are no great older wines, only great bottles, applies here. Provenance, cork integrity and storage conditions make drinking such an old wine always a bit of a crapshoot. It doesn't to have a backup bottle handy should the experience prove less than ideal.
Mark Lipton
AlexR wrote:28 and 29 were back-to-back great years.
Dale Williams
Compassionate Connoisseur
11880
Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm
Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)
Dale Williams wrote:I agree with simple food to let the wine be focus, but Caesar salad wouldn't be my first thought as a wine friendly match (especially with an aged red). Roast chicken for me.
Dale Williams
Compassionate Connoisseur
11880
Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm
Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, SemrushBot and 0 guests