The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:37 pm

I am not a multimillionaire, nor am I poor. I will not review Petrus, or Montet Cadet. My golden mean is the clutch of quality Cru B’s and middle Classed Growths. And I will only comment on those I deem wonderful, or at least highly interesting. Don’t care to talk about those that are average, or bad, the domain of drain.

Reclusing to our mountain lake cottage on Friday night, the first time in over a month, my wife, Lynn, and I treated it more special than usual. The temperature was in the 60s, the sun shining, the snow melting, the lake looking as if it might shed its winter coat a month early, and Woody, our chipmunk, scurrying around looking for nuts – which I quickly made easier for him, or her. You can count me in the group that thinks global warming not to be much of a problem. It’s something we can be thankful for: those of us living on high ground in the north, anyway.

So, on Saturday I gambled that 2001 Beychevelle might be special. I am sure it is much better when you know what it is, than if you tasted it blind. The Minoan sailboat on the label looks to be Dionysus’s, the one he sailed to Naxos after Ariadne. But why would a god dip his sales to any thing mortal? Ah, part of the magic, and he was only half a god. Accolades I have read of the property go back to the fifteen hundreds, and they probably made wine there long before that. I guess they would know what they were doing by now.

I accepted our bottle by its gorgeous popped cork alone. Poured, the bouquet immediately soared. Fully mature, sensuously soft, and ready, classic Bordeaux. Lynn and I spoke at once. She said, Pauillac, as I said it could have been a Graves (because of its wonderful earth and tobacco balanced with the classiest aromas of phenomenally glorious dark fruit, of course knowing what it was; I’m the sommelier of our union). "Saint Julien!" Lynn cried. And then we both would have known so blind as the spicy finish lingered for a full minute. That factor seems to be the most common distinguisher of a Classed Growth as opposed to a good Cru B. Cru B’s can smell and taste great, but they rarely kick out a minute-long finish. And initial confusion as to appellation often points to Saint Julien, the Medoc chameleon.

Since last night I have eschewed the descriptor ‘complex’ from my wine lexicon. Word 2007 code is complex; wines like 2001 Beychevelle are not like that; they are integrated with lots of intuitive associations, like a perfect spring you almost remember from early childhood: beautiful memories, smells, notions of great music, chthonic roots and cosmic time, etc. Immensely interesting and connected to our whole being (for those of us who think so, anyway), but ‘complex’ speaks too much like rationality for me to apply to such a biologically intimate liquor.

Lynn said if we never had a better bottle, it would be enough.

Digression: My first shipment of 2007 Bordeaux arrived on Saturday to an empty house, while we were at camp; so it will travel around like Charlie on the streets of Boston until I can catch up with it. Away one day out of a week, and of course that’s when it arrives. I will likely review a couple of those.
no avatar
User

Diane (Long Island)

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

744

Joined

Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:47 pm

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Diane (Long Island) » Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:31 pm

I always enjoy your Bordeaux notes, Covert., and this one is no exception. Lately, I have been drinking everything but....you have reminded me it's time to open a Bordeaux, especially when you write that this 2001 is fully mature.
Diane
no avatar
User

Richard Fadeley OLD

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

493

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 10:42 pm

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Richard Fadeley OLD » Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:11 pm

Covert,
I share your love and respect for Bordeaux, though I lack you eloquence and descriptive powers. I am sitting here reviewing an '05 Chateau Coufran that fits you description of a Cru Bourgeois to a tea. It is a very nice wine, but won't quite reach the classified level, but for $22 it is good QPR. I have recently purchased some classified '05's in the sub-$25 range but they are exceptions to the rule. "Carpe Diem"! As close as I can come to your Beychevelle would be several '99 Gloria's that I have enjoyed over the past year. Often overlooked chateaus that, as Lynn said, are "all that you need"!
Richard Fadeley, CWS
aka Webwineman
no avatar
User

AlexR

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

806

Joined

Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:28 am

Location

Bordeaux

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by AlexR » Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:58 am

Lovely notes, Covert.

I had the same wine a month ago at my place in honor of an English lady who had worked for years at Château Loudenne and who has retired in the Médoc.

We all found it classic and enjoyable. Still too young, but mostly there.

I have two cases of 2001 Bordeaux, which I would call a "classic Bordeaux lover's vintage", as opposed to a concentrated point-chasing vintage.

Best regards,
Alex R.
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:11 am

Diane (Long Island) wrote:I always enjoy your Bordeaux notes, Covert., and this one is no exception. Lately, I have been drinking everything but....you have reminded me it's time to open a Bordeaux, especially when you write that this 2001 is fully mature.


I still have six 1996 Ducru Beaucaillous. I should send one to my father's house on Long Island so sometime when I am there we can drink it. I guess they are slightly ready to drink, now. I know you tried one a while back, but it must have shown very young. I opened one for science a few years ago and wished I hadn't. I started with seven, in case the still having six and drinking one didn't exactly compute. :)
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:20 am

AlexR wrote:Lovely notes, Covert.

I had the same wine a month ago at my place in honor of an English lady who had worked for years at Château Loudenne and who has retired in the Médoc.

We all found it classic and enjoyable. Still too young, but mostly there.

I have two cases of 2001 Bordeaux, which I would call a "classic Bordeaux lover's vintage", as opposed to a concentrated point-chasing vintage.

Best regards,
Alex R.


Thanks, Alex; I keep my cellar at 60 degrees ◦F rather than 55, so that could have made the difference. I am pretty sure my bottle was at its pinnacle. You can usually tell when they couldn't be better, not that some people didn't get their taste at Brigham Young University, eating Idaho freedom fries. I agree in liking the "classic" 2001 vintage very much and am thinking I had better get at my 2001s and 1999s.
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:36 am

Richard Fadeley wrote:Covert,
I share your love and respect for Bordeaux, though I lack you eloquence and descriptive powers. I am sitting here reviewing an '05 Chateau Coufran that fits you description of a Cru Bourgeois to a tea. It is a very nice wine, but won't quite reach the classified level, but for $22 it is good QPR. I have recently purchased some classified '05's in the sub-$25 range but they are exceptions to the rule. "Carpe Diem"! As close as I can come to your Beychevelle would be several '99 Gloria's that I have enjoyed over the past year. Often overlooked chateaus that, as Lynn said, are "all that you need"!


I drank a 2005 Coufran at a restaurant recently, so I know what you mean. And I also love the 1999 Gloria, as I do most Glorias. I am sure you know that Gloria is considered to be at a Classed Growth level, rather than at that of a Cru Bourgeois. Its owners just blew off entering it for the 1855 Classification. Later owners, probably out of invidiousness over that inadvertency, and a sense of deserved entitlement, have declined the Cru Bourgeois label, as well. 2003 Gloria is pretty glorious in my opinion, too.
no avatar
User

Richard Fadeley OLD

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

493

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 10:42 pm

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Richard Fadeley OLD » Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:48 am

Actually Chateau Gloria did not exist in 1855. It was cobbled together by Henri Martin starting in 1942, with a few parcels here and there, all from classified chateaus in St.-Julien, all well known, even a parcel that Duhart Milon owned in St.-Julien. Sort of helps explain the quality factor. I think they are right not to accept a Cru Borgeios ranking, sort of like Sociando-Mallet. The wine doctor gives a good account of the history here:
http://www.thewinedoctor.com/tastingspr ... oria.shtml
Richard Fadeley, CWS
aka Webwineman
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:10 am

Richard Fadeley wrote:Actually Chateau Gloria did not exist in 1855. It was cobbled together by Henri Martin starting in 1942, with a few parcels here and there, all from classified chateaus in St.-Julien, all well known, even a parcel that Duhart Milon owned in St.-Julien. Sort of helps explain the quality factor. I think they are right not to accept a Cru Borgeios ranking, sort of like Sociando-Mallet. The wine doctor gives a good account of the history here:
http://www.thewinedoctor.com/tastingspr ... oria.shtml


Jesus, I better start first looking up facts I pontificate about. Thanks. Had that in my memory from somewhere, don't know where I got it.

Did you ever read My Life and Loves by Frank Harris? He quoted a ton of stuff from memory that was incorrect. I use him as my precedent not to worry about it. :)
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by Covert » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:40 pm

Richard Fadeley wrote:Actually Chateau Gloria did not exist in 1855. It was cobbled together by Henri Martin starting in 1942, with a few parcels here and there, all from classified chateaus in St.-Julien, all well known, even a parcel that Duhart Milon owned in St.-Julien. Sort of helps explain the quality factor. I think they are right not to accept a Cru Borgeios ranking, sort of like Sociando-Mallet. The wine doctor gives a good account of the history here:
http://www.thewinedoctor.com/tastingspr ... oria.shtml


Let me revisit my answer to you at the end of a long day. I don't really want to be glib. It's embarrassing to know how much I can confabulate information, snatching a fragment from here, and another from there, and piecing them back together into nonsense. I guess I read about the property blowing off the Cru B label and how the vineyards in part came from areas that had been classified and then muddled it all.
no avatar
User

ChefJCarey

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4508

Joined

Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm

Location

Noir Side of the Moon

Re: WTN: 2001 Beychevelle

by ChefJCarey » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:49 pm

Did you ever read My Life and Loves by Frank Harris? He quoted a ton of stuff from memory that was incorrect. I use him as my precedent not to worry about it. :)


Yes.
Rex solutus est a legibus - NOT

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: APNIC Bot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign