by David M. Bueker » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:34 am
Tom,
The "Monktown Attorney" as you like to call him actually had nothing to do with me buying this wine. He did not review the '98, though I see he said to drink the 2000 "over the next decade" in 2003. I actually had never read his note on the wine in full until a few moments ago. He makes no claim of absolute certainty about aging potential. It has been readers who looked at the journal that made the leap from recommendaitons to a perception of absolute certainty, doing so only moments after deciding that points were not just shorthand but rather gospel carved in the hardest marble.
As for the Gourt, predicting the aging curve of a wine is an exercise in futility for everyone, but there is an expectation from many people that a critic can pinpoint the exact time when they should drink their treasured bottle of Chateau X. Too early is almost always better than too late (Burgundy and Barolo seem to be the exceptions that prove the rule), though more often than not a wine will suprise on the upside rather than the way ths one did. As David Schildknecht has often said (by quoting Terry Theise), the wine will always have the last word.
Decisions are made by those who show up