The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Andrew Burge

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

175

Joined

Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:21 am

Location

Brisbane Australia

Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Andrew Burge » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:45 pm

HI everyone,

I've followed the various threads here and elsewhere on the phenomenon of Premature oxidation in white burgundies of vaious vintages and the various theories that accompany this.

It occurs to me - I never see the same discussion about Red Burgundies. Why does everyone think this might be?

Regards

Andrew
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Rahsaan » Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:02 pm

Andrew Burge wrote:It occurs to me - I never see the same discussion about Red Burgundies.


Don't tempt fate! :wink:
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11880

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Dale Williams » Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:12 pm

The most Burg-centric of my tasting groups has had this discussion a couple of times. To sum up the theories advanced by my more knowledgeable friends:

1) it's coming. People just aren't drinking 96 and 99 reds as often. People expect reds to age longer, and aren't opening.
2) the tannins are giving some/more oxidation protection. Some feel the reds also might not age as well as in the past, but its too soon to see the early oxidation
3) sulfur is easier to detect in white wines, and people cut the sulphur in whites more than reds ( I swing both ways on the spelling!)
4) the issue is specific to whites (technique related like gentle presses, batonnage, etc)
5) perception- it's easier to spot oxidation in whites than reds
no avatar
User

Andrew Burge

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

175

Joined

Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:21 am

Location

Brisbane Australia

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Andrew Burge » Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:19 pm

Thanks Dale,

The thing that spurred on my question was an 02 Fourrier Chambolle Musigny that tasted past its prime. The more time I spent on it the more I thought it just tasted flat out oxidised, and quite unlike earlier bottles of the same wine.

I guess I'll just cross my fingers a while longer...
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Rahsaan » Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:12 am

Andrew Burge wrote:Thanks Dale,

The thing that spurred on my question was an 02 Fourrier Chambolle Musigny that tasted past its prime. The more time I spent on it the more I thought it just tasted flat out oxidised, and quite unlike earlier bottles of the same wine.

I guess I'll just cross my fingers a while longer...


I think there has been a lot of debate around Fourrier in particular because of some of his production techniques, although I thought it was the 2001s that were most likely to taste off.
no avatar
User

Salil

Rank

Franc de Pied

Posts

2689

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Location

albany, ny

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Salil » Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:20 am

Rahsaan,
Could you elaborate more on the Fourrier production techniques? I've heard lots about the wines, never tasted one but did buy one bottle of the '04 Cherbaudes recently.
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by Rahsaan » Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:43 am

Salil wrote:Rahsaan,
Could you elaborate more on the Fourrier production techniques? I've heard lots about the wines, never tasted one but did buy one bottle of the '04 Cherbaudes recently.


Do a search on Fourrier in ebob. There have been lots of threads about these problems. This one in particular is good:

http://dat.erobertparker.com/bboard/sho ... t=Fourrier

But there are plenty of threads to keep you busy reading for a while.

I think the main issues may be the specific corks used or the lack of sulphur. But there are plenty of folks with more strongly-held views and more experience than I have. I've only had a few Fourrier wines and they've all been great.
no avatar
User

ChaimShraga

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

663

Joined

Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:53 am

Location

Tel-Aviv, Israel

Re: Burgundy Premox - why white and not red?

by ChaimShraga » Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:14 am

Depressing.

Maybe this is why a bottle of Rene Engel Grand Echezeaux 96 we drank last week seemed readier to drink than we had expected?
Positive Discrimination For White Wines!
http://2GrandCru.blogspot.com

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign