The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Covert » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:14 am

Otto praised this offering a couple of years ago. I came back to him, after picking up six bottles of it following his recommendation, in disagreement, thinking it – well, I don’t remember, exactly – but not very good. I am going to give Otto the benefit of any doubt that he could see a bit into the future, much better than Robert Parker, when, in 2006, he said: “This is a competent but uninspiring effort. Aromas of figs, plums, and black cherries emerge from this straightforward, soft, medium-bodied, simple, one-dimensional offering. Drink it over the next decade”…85 points.

My former Boss, who created The Wine Bar, a fine American restaurant, in Saratoga Springs, New York, for his avocational relaxation, invited my wife, Lynn, and me to join him and his wife there last night for dinner. He said he would bring a couple of reds and a white from his private cellar. So as to not possibly eclipse whatever he brought, I took along one of my lowly 2003 Cantemerles. I figured it would be forward enough to drink well as a table wine prefacing whatever wine Dale brought.

A very attractive bottle of 2006 Hanzell Chardonnay was poured all around while the reds were addressed. I approve all wines now by smelling the cork. I know that some say it is useless, but I have found it infallible over the last couple of years; and more elegant than picking up a glass before the rest of the party holds theirs. The beauty of the cork almost knocked me off my chair, in amazement, but also in trepidation, that I had done exactly what I didn’t want to have done, upstage the second red.

The restaurant’s wonderfully poised, newly acquired head waitress from Mount St. Helena, California; who, from her interest and knowledge, could have been designated a sommelier; poured all around again and the bouquet became palpable by all from the table top, before a glass was lifted to a lip. Wonderfully complex nose and long distinguished finish, with an accent of St-Julien-esque spice, and all its other school components nicely balanced and delicious in-between.

Then the host’s red, a 1996 Latour A Pomerol. It was just as good. Very powerful for a Pomerol, with sensuous elements that might be referred to as feminized Paulliac, like the first smell from your brand new Bentley upon opening its door. It’s not often that I open three wines and am absolutely delighted by all of them without a hint of bickering among them.

I went on a bit, but mostly I wanted to apologize to Otto.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

"I think you should apologize."

-- Jiminy Cricket
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44984

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Jenise » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:27 am

Nice note and nice wines. I especially want to comment on the Hanzell: I love chardonnay and there are so many good reasonably priced ones I rarely spent more than $20 on them. The one non-Burgundy chardonnay that can get me to part with the big bucks? Hanzell.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Saina

Rank

Musaroholic

Posts

3976

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Location

Helsinki, Finland

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Saina » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:53 pm

Glad you eventually enjoyed it. I drank all mine already - enjoyed it very much as an example of unspoofy Bordeaux yet it was also to my tastes very approachable young.
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Covert » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:00 pm

Otto Nieminen wrote:Glad you eventually enjoyed it. I drank all mine already - enjoyed it very much as an example of unspoofy Bordeaux yet it was also to my tastes very approachable young.


Depending on how long ago you finished your last bottle, Otto, you might want to procure a couple more. It was nothing short of amazing last night.
no avatar
User

Agostino Berti

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

196

Joined

Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:47 pm

Location

Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Agostino Berti » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:19 pm

Glad to hear it. I have a 2003 Cantemerle in my cellar which I brought back from the US (only 30 bucks) based on some 1988's I had years back which were awesome. Parker is such a fool. He is finally being recognized as such. A fool owned by the wine industry. A total non-Advocate of the consumer. :mrgreen:
“Seekers of gold dig up much earth and find little.”
― Heraclitus
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by Covert » Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:50 am

Agostino Berti wrote:Glad to hear it. I have a 2003 Cantemerle in my cellar which I brought back from the US (only 30 bucks) based on some 1988's I had years back which were awesome. Parker is such a fool. He is finally being recognized as such. A fool owned by the wine industry. A total non-Advocate of the consumer. :mrgreen:


Either I have lost some connection to the wine-world zeitgeist, which is very possible, or Parker has lost some relevance in it. I used to hear and read about his influence all the time, but now rarely hear or see anything about him. I have drunk enough clarets that he has also rated to be of the opinion that while he has a great memory connected with his nose, and an ability to predict drinking plateaus somewhat accurately, he has scant connection with the qualities that make Bordeaux great to many of its lovers. Like many crude Americans - and it's not just Americans, just crude and busy people in general - he seems not to appreciate much of the poetry, sublimity and grandeur of Bordeaux wines. A little bit here and there, but not much of it.

Many a consumer of the type that might chase after back-to-school sales or collect coupons, likewise, in my opinion, would not normally grok many of the relational and transformational elements of fine Bordeaux compared to your devoted Bordeaux lover. But many an average consumer today has backed away from any consideration of Bordeaux in his household budget because of the risen cost. And when these everyday consumers also don't hear Parker's name much anymore, there is no slot for his influence in their lives.
Last edited by Covert on Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
no avatar
User

John F

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

468

Joined

Sat May 20, 2006 3:50 am

Re: 2003 Ch. Cantemerle; An apology to Otto...

by John F » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:22 am

Jenise wrote:Nice note and nice wines. I especially want to comment on the Hanzell: I love chardonnay and there are so many good reasonably priced ones I rarely spent more than $20 on them. The one non-Burgundy chardonnay that can get me to part with the big bucks? Hanzell.



Jenise - have you ever had the Peter Michael chards? They aren't cheap but I love them

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Babbar, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign