The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4972

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by Tim York » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:11 pm

We had some interesting and contrasted wines last week.

Auxey Duresses 2005 – Domaine Taupenot-Merme –Alc.13% was a brightly focused, delicately fruity (some cherry) and mineral red Burgundy with medium body, good length and lively acidity; not very complex but with an elegance and class which stamps Burgundian superiority, even from a villages wine and obscure commune to boot, over most other wines; 16/20+.

Rosso Conero “Cúmaro” 2000 – Umani Ronchi – Alc. 13.5%, from the Montepulciano grape and a “prestige” bottling, may be a crowd-pleaser and point collector but was diminished, IMO, by its oak treatment. It was fine polished and pleasing oak but it removed varietal and regional personality from a full bodied, deep and richly fruited wine. Only towards the end of the meal some of the varietally typical spicy English fruit cake and mince pie peep through but there was still a lack of the frequently typical minerality and firm tannins; still quite enjoyable albeit internationally anonymous 15/20.

By contrast Savennières 2001 – Nicolas Joly – Alc. 13% (biodynamic culture) exuded personality and complexity even if showing some flaws which could disqualify it for many. Quite deep yellow in colour and quite dry, full bodied and rich, yet with a sweeter personality seeming to want to come out, it showed decent acidity and minerality, flavours and aromas of quince and wax but also botrytis (probably not noble) together with honey and iodine notes. Fascinating, though; 16/20+.

Arbois Chardonnay 2007 – Domaine André et Mireille Tissot – Alc. 13%, their basic cuvée, was delightfully crisp and mineral even though some of the flint aromas may have owed more to sulphur than to the terroir; there was a nice undertow of white fruit with some “gras”; 15.5/20++.

Campo de Borja Viña Collado 2006 – Bodegas Santo Cristo- Alc. 13.5% (<€5) is an exemplary QPR! Garnacha based red showing attractively fresh sweet fruit with good body and structure and enough acidity and grip for interest; 15/20++.

Vino da Tavola “Dopoteatro” 1997 – Podere Salicutti, Montalcino – Alc. 14%, from Cabernet Sauvignon, Canaiolo and Sangiovese, has evolved well beyond the primary fruit stage and showed a strong Tuscan accent with full body, classical shape, OK length, deep, complex and quite dark textures together with decent acidity, minerals, tar, leathery tang, old books and warm tannic structure to support the finish; 16.5/20+.

(I had to write most of these notes twice. Having neglected to save, my fingers somehow brushed a key which deleted the whole of my text up to then :mad: . A salutary lesson.)
Tim York
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by David M. Bueker » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:17 pm

I admit that I am struggling to figure out the flaws in the Joly. The botrytis perhaps?
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4972

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by Tim York » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:18 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:I admit that I am struggling to figure out the flaws in the Joly. The botrytis perhaps?


Yes, together with the iodine and honey. A cocktail that many may dislike.
Tim York
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by David M. Bueker » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:23 pm

Perhaps. It actually sounds appealing to me.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4972

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by Tim York » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:39 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:Perhaps. It actually sounds appealing to me.


I liked it as I hope my note conveys.
Tim York
no avatar
User

Oswaldo Costa

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1902

Joined

Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:30 am

Location

São Paulo, Brazil

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by Oswaldo Costa » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:57 pm

Tim York wrote:
David M. Bueker wrote:Perhaps. It actually sounds appealing to me.


I liked it as I hope my note conveys.


And no oxidative notes too, that's good.
"I went on a rigorous diet that eliminated alcohol, fat and sugar. In two weeks, I lost 14 days." Tim Maia, Brazilian singer-songwriter.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by David M. Bueker » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:59 pm

Oswaldo Costa wrote:
Tim York wrote:
David M. Bueker wrote:Perhaps. It actually sounds appealing to me.


I liked it as I hope my note conveys.


And no oxidative notes too, that's good.


Exactly!
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

ChaimShraga

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

663

Joined

Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:53 am

Location

Tel-Aviv, Israel

Re: WTN: Fine village Burg, modern R.Conero, flawed Joly, etc.

by ChaimShraga » Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:34 am

Oh, I've had the same impression of the Cumaro as you about three years ago. Seems like it has that international style etched so deeply even a few more years in the cellar didn't help any.
Positive Discrimination For White Wines!
http://2GrandCru.blogspot.com

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazon, Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, DotBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign