The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2004 St. Innocent Temperence Hill

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44979

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

WTN: 2004 St. Innocent Temperence Hill

by Jenise » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:34 pm

Didn't know what to expect: bought these on blind faith direct from the winery, and found a very black, atypically tannic pinot noir. Mark's previous Temperence Hills did not prepare me for this. I bought these for a friend who asked me to add them to my own order and who later got amnesia about that fact (must have tasted one in the meantime!) so I was stuck with them. Disappointed on several fronts, I put them away and forgot about them.

Until last night when I sent the hubby out to the cellar to grab an American pinot noir of his choosing to go with an Asian-themed dinner, and this is what he brought back.

He poured the wine. I sniffed. PINE CONES. I kid you not, pine cones. Like the big ones we used to collect in Yosemite when I was a kid. Pine cones and green pine needles. Then I tasted--ugh, American oak? So we read the label and though it doesn't admit to American oak, the label doesn't entirely rule it out either with "16 months in 36% new French Oak." The piney herb thing prevails on the palate, obliterating the meager fruit which drops out by the end of the bottle anyway. This wine is the dud I didn't think a St. Innocent pinot could ever be. A mistake from the very beginning and largely unpleasant, though strangely it worked with the food and especially well with the fried rice which I'd made out of aged basmati and which otherwise has the unfortunate habit of making any wine it's paired with taste dirty. I'll dump the rest.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: 2004 St. Innocent Temperence Hill

by David M. Bueker » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:09 pm

I think you are misinterpeting the label. I do not believe that he is using American oak, but that he is using 36% new French oak (just missing a word). I have had no issues with this wine, though now you have me thinking about where I stashed my last bottle (I have been drinking up 2004s).
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44979

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 St. Innocent Temperence Hill

by Jenise » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:48 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:I think you are misinterpeting the label. I do not believe that he is using American oak, but that he is using 36% new French oak (just missing a word). I have had no issues with this wine, though now you have me thinking about where I stashed my last bottle (I have been drinking up 2004s).


So the rest is just not new? Really does smell like American oak, though.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: 2004 St. Innocent Temperence Hill

by David M. Bueker » Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:57 pm

Either not new or not in barrel (though the latter seems unlikely).
Decisions are made by those who show up

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, DotBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign