David M. Bueker wrote:Oswaldo - don't do it! Wine is about pleasure, not about analytical figures that then become the topic of discussion. Witness the alcohol debate. Does anyone care what the wine actually tastes like anymore?
But for me it's a source of pleasure to not only drink a wine but also to try to "understand" analytically why I love some and not others. A mix of the sensual and the didactic. In some cases it's obvious. In others, not so much. For example, if I find a dullness, I may suspect that it's SO2, but have no way of checking. Or if the acidity and sweetness are not in balance, it's not always obvious if it's too acid or insufficiently sweet, or insufficiently acid or too sweet. Also alcohol, the % on the label often doesn't jive with what one experiences.
IF I were to do this sort of testing, I might abandon it later as useless, but it would be part and parcel of what wine pleasure means to my temperament, which incldues attempting to "understand" a little bit better some of the maddeningly elusive variables. While it will never be possible to fully understand wine (or anything), it's perfectly possible to care immensely about how a wine tastes AND at the same time want to understand the levels of some of the crucial variables.
"I went on a rigorous diet that eliminated alcohol, fat and sugar. In two weeks, I lost 14 days." Tim Maia, Brazilian singer-songwriter.