The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Keith M

Rank

Beer Explorer

Posts

1184

Joined

Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:25 am

Location

Finger Lakes, New York

WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Keith M » Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:12 am

A recent well-attended gathering in chilly fall weather offered a fantastic opportunity to compare cru beaujolais at Arlequin in San Francisco—very interesting indeed. Biggest cru beaujolais tasting I've done yet and great opportunity to compare crus and experience producers--certainly developed an appreciation for Morgon and particularly the Côte du Py. Still figuring out many of the other cru . . .

First up were the wines of Kermit Lynch starting with the 2008 Jean-Paul Thévenet Morgon Vieilles Vignes with a bit of brett, full-on fruit and charred fireplace on the finish. The 2008 Domaine Diochon Moulin-à-Vent Vieilles Vignes was being served from magnum and had absolutely nothing to say so I returned to it before I left and found it grippy but also somewhat buttery. It was actually quite delicious—good acid. The 2008 Jean Foillard Morgon Côte du Py initially captured my fancy with its delicious and approachable mouthfeel, but perhaps its dry tightness don't offer the best finish at the moment. In any case, it didn't justify its pricetag north of 30 bucks. The no-sulfur 2008 Marcel Lapierre Morgon had an easygoing raspberry candy nose, but tasted far more interesting—dried fruit that was juicy with light charcoal—really a lighter touch on this one. The 2007 Guy Breton Morgon Vieilles Vignes was quieter on the nose and hard to read at the moment—reminded me of soft lake water—the fruit had really released its grip on this one.

Onto the second table with the wines of Peter Weygandt. First were a series of selections from the producer Domaine du Vissoux (Pierre-Marie Chermette), which was very useful for my purpose of comparing different cru. The 2007 Beaujolais VV Cuvée Traditionnelle was bright chipper and giving, but pretty basic beaujolais, whereas the 2008 Beaujolais VV Cuvée Traditionnelle was more interesting—more savory nose, punchier in the mouth—rich deliciousness I found appealing. The 2007 Brouilly Perrieux was tasty—I really liked its combo of blood and iron. The 2008 Fleurie Les Garants was more alpine, more acid, and more stemmy. The 2007 Moulin-à-Vent Les Trois Roches really stood out—savory, tasted pretty big, yet more structured and heavier than I would have expected. It offered an interesting combo. Onto the next producer, the 2008 Daniel Bouland Côte de Brouilly Cuvée Melanie was very high-toned on the nose—and tart, inward and tight—lots of acid here. Mouthwatering—but felt like it needed time to balance out. The 2008 Daniel Bouland Morgon Vieilles Vignes offered quite lumbering structure and little else—it needs time too, I think.

And to the last table to be blown away by the wines of LDM/Louis/Dressner. The 2008 Domaine des Terres Dorées (Jean-Paul Brun) Beaujolais Cuvée l'Ancien Vieilles Vignes was just fantastic—slithery, soft and delicious—ready for immediate drinking without a doubt. The 2008 Domaine des Terres Dorées (Jean-Paul Brun) Côte de Brouilly offered more complexity, good grip, more blood, and was playful. The 2006 Desvignes Morgon Côte du Py was richer in terms of concentration, but its dark plush fruit worked with the wine's firm grip. The 2006 Desvignes Morgon Côte du Py Javernières returned to the smell of raspberry candy—it was a lighter touch and yet kept on with plain deliciousness—one of my favorites. The 2008 Coudert Fleurie Clos de la Roilette reminded me of rocks and flowers—it felt very fluttery and I never decided exactly where it was or is going. The NV Domaine des Terres Dorées (Jean-Paul Brun) FRV 100 was a sparkling gamay that was outstanding—bright and chipper on the nose and savory and delicious in the mouth—made me pine for some roast chicken. Deliciousness!
no avatar
User

SteveEdmunds

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

985

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:05 am

Location

Berkeley, CA

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by SteveEdmunds » Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:51 am

I bought a bottle of the Foillard at Kermit's Thursday, choosing, despite Michael Butler's assertion that the '09 Beaujolais Nouveaus were the best he'd ever had. I was initially dismayed by the price. Then, when I opened it, I was dismayed by what seemed to be the loosey-goosey winemaking approach with little to no SO2, and the sense that the wine was far too mature-seeming, and complex for a wine so young. Turned out it just needed a couple minutes of air. It's a wine I would categorize as Burgundy. Serious, mineral, layered, and probably going to get better for a long time. I don't think that's the kind of experience one could have with this wine in the context of the tasting you describe, though.
I don't know just how I'm supposed to play this scene, but I ain't afraid to learn...
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Rahsaan » Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:37 am

Lots of nice wines there. Sounds like a fun tasting. Although as Steve says, the best fun comes with more contemplation.

I too an a big fan of Morgon/Cote du Py/Foillard. And I must admit that the price increases have made me hesitant at times to buy. But (admittedly not having tasted the 08) everytime I do drink them I am reminded of the deep joy and it probably is well worth $30. YMMV.
no avatar
User

Keith M

Rank

Beer Explorer

Posts

1184

Joined

Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:25 am

Location

Finger Lakes, New York

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Keith M » Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:06 am

Steve Edmunds wrote:I bought a bottle of the Foillard . . . Turned out it just needed a couple minutes of air. It's a wine I would categorize as Burgundy. Serious, mineral, layered, and probably going to get better for a long time. I don't think that's the kind of experience one could have with this wine in the context of the tasting you describe, though.

Rahsaan wrote:I too an a big fan of Morgon/Cote du Py/Foillard. And I must admit that the price increases have made me hesitant at times to buy. But (admittedly not having tasted the 08) everytime I do drink them I am reminded of the deep joy and it probably is well worth $30.

These are very helpful comments indeed. The Foillard was undoubtedly my favorite standout wine after finishing my first run through the tasting and was one of only three wines I returned to for a retaste. It was there where it really did not hold together for my tastes--and my evaluation of it was downgraded accordingly. I have little difficulty, however, in believing that it is serious stuff, so I appreciate these comments--alas, I may feel the need to revisit the issue personally!
no avatar
User

Salil

Rank

Franc de Pied

Posts

2689

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Location

albany, ny

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Salil » Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:12 am

Sounds like a very nice tasting, and really timely notes Keith as Beaujolais is an area I've just started exploring after a couple of interesting bottles recently. Will be keeping my eye out for a few of those.
no avatar
User

Oswaldo Costa

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1902

Joined

Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:30 am

Location

São Paulo, Brazil

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Oswaldo Costa » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:34 am

Because they're Bojo, we're sort of programmed to think it's fine to drink them so young, but my experience with older Gang of 4 Morgons suggests that they start to really shine at around 4 or 5 years of age. Then they become paradigm changing...
"I went on a rigorous diet that eliminated alcohol, fat and sugar. In two weeks, I lost 14 days." Tim Maia, Brazilian singer-songwriter.
no avatar
User

Ian H

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

122

Joined

Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:39 pm

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Ian H » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:45 am

Oswaldo Costa wrote:Because they're Bojo, we're sort of programmed to think it's fine to drink them so young, but my experience with older Gang of 4 Morgons suggests that they start to really shine at around 4 or 5 years of age. Then they become paradigm changing...
Hear hear.

If there's one thing that I really resent in the vogue for B.N. that - thankfully - is passing, is the dire effect it had on real Beaujolais. I think you've seen a similar effect with Blush Zin. It's so much easier to make than the Crus and your money comes in right away. I can understand WHY people switched to making mainly BN, but I still regret it.

At a "finest and rarest" tasting at Sothebys in the 80s, the real surprise wasn't that Mouton-Rothschild and Lafite Rothschild '59s were magnificent, it was that '47 Beaujolais crus were - first of all, alive, secondly, delicious (forgive the highly technical TN) and thirdly so astonishingly Burgundian.

I've still got some Chamonard Morgon '96 in my cellar, and I'm not in any great hurry to finish it up. But I am English and so by definition an oenogerontophile.
--
All the best
Ian (in France)
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Rahsaan » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:44 am

Keith M wrote:I have little difficulty, however, in believing that it is serious stuff, so I appreciate these comments--alas, I may feel the need to revisit the issue personally!


In the end it all comes to down to personal taste and price sensitivity, so many people will find the $30plus for Morgon to be expensive. But if you dig the style (and I think you do/will) one has to admit that the wine is special. Of course I should walk more of this walk as I must admit I've been buying less Beaujolais myself as they get closer and closer to $30. But (to make a terrible and awkward cross-regional comparison), when I think about how I'd pay $40ish for not-always-thrilling village Burgundy and then think about the immense pleasure for $30 Foillard, I change my attitude.

On another note, I haven't had as much Desvignes as I would like. Nice to hear your positive comments although I see the comparisons were also skewed a bit by those have 2 extra years of age.
no avatar
User

Oswaldo Costa

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1902

Joined

Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:30 am

Location

São Paulo, Brazil

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Oswaldo Costa » Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:09 am

My experience with two Desvignes (Py & Javernieres) wasn't as pleasurable as Go4 or Descombes (or Vissoux, in a different style). They had excellent structure and elegant fruit, but were too "serious," with insufficient beaujolaisity.
"I went on a rigorous diet that eliminated alcohol, fat and sugar. In two weeks, I lost 14 days." Tim Maia, Brazilian singer-songwriter.
no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Re: WTN: Cru beaujolais at Arlequin

by Brian K Miller » Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:16 pm

Fantastic post, guys. Maybe I will wait to open some Beaujolais I was planning to bring to Thursday.
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazon, Amazonbot, Apple Bot, Babbar, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Mark Lipton, SemrushBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign