The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Bill Spohn

Rank

He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'

Posts

10726

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm

Location

Vancouver BC

TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by Bill Spohn » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:20 am

Notes from a wine dinner I did last weekend. Probably surprised my guests a bit. I have a reputation for serving up great bloody slabs of protein and neglecting vegetables except as almost garnishes. This time, I did an almost completely vegetarian dinner with only one small bit of protein, just to confuse them.

1995 Drappier Champagne Cuvee du Millenaire ‘2000’ - made for the millennium celebrations (nicely avoiding the ‘real millennium, false millennium’ issues as it could be used on either Dec. 31 1999 or 2000). Nice citrus and yeast in the nose, crisp and with a surprising amount of flavour in mid palate.

Served with a chived Parmesan tuile.

1999 Ch. De Beaucastel Vielles Vignes Roussanne - I wanted a white wine with some power behind it, and this one, the best white in the Southern Rhone (IMO) fit the bill nicely. Made in very small amounts (4-500 cases a year) with miniscule yields (often around 1 ton/acre), it has never failed to imprss me. On this one I noted a fairly deep amber colour, a sweet warm apricot nose that with air became peach rather than apricot, weighty feel with a big body for a white, and good balance.

Served with a thick autumn squash and leek soup on top of which I floated pieces of seared foie gras.

Next up were an interesting Italian pairing.

2000 Poliziano Le Stanze – this IGT is a Bordeaux blend of cab and merlot, and the nose showed some blood/meat and a faint hint of nutmeg. Still fairly tannic, it was nevertheless very enjoyable, full in the mouth with some vanilla flavour, through a medium long finish.

1988 Lungarotti San Giorgio – this mature cabernet was showing a more ‘cabish’ nose, mature and mellow, and it was also quite mellow on palate, supple and smooth, though not without a bit of remaining tannin, and excellent acidity.

For that pair I made mushroom agnolotti with a truffled cream, bacon, and bail sauce.

1982 Ch. Palmer – good colour, deep nose of dark fruit and a hint of anise, clean integrated presence on palate and a balanced lengthy finish. Classic clatter.

1983 Ch. Palmer – there aren’t a lot of house where the 83 was better than the 82, especially now that the 83s seem to have peaked, for the most part, before the 92s, but Palmer is a classic example of a good 82 followed by a great 83. It had a big assertive, slightly animal nose with tons of fruit, cassis, some cedar, in the mouth a fair bit of extract, excellent weight and a really excellent long finish, tapering off very slowly. We allowed as how this was the best Bordeaux any of us had tasted in a long time. Wish I had a case of it!

I served this with an autumn mushroom ragout topped with a braised quail and Pommes Anna, a strata of potatoes baked with heavy cream.

1970 Burmester Port – I probably bought this wine back in the late 1970s and it was my last bottle, chosen not because it was a top Port, which it isn’t, but for it’s maturity. Hot nose, sweet and pleasant in the mouth, with medium length, amply repaying the quarter century or more of storage in my cellar.
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9717

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by Rahsaan » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:56 am

Bill Spohn wrote:This time, I did an almost completely vegetarian dinner with only one small bit of protein, just to confuse them.


But there was protein in every course! :wink:

Sounds like a nice selection of wines.
no avatar
User

Jon Peterson

Rank

The Court Winer

Posts

2981

Joined

Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:53 pm

Location

The Blue Crab State

Re: TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by Jon Peterson » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:54 pm

Bill Spohn wrote:...there aren’t a lot of house where the 83 was better than the 82, especially now that the 83s seem to have peaked, for the most part, before the 92s, but Palmer is a classic example of a good 82 followed by a great 83.


The weather in Margaux in 1983 was so much better than the weather in Bordeaux, in general, in 1982...I wish I had a case of the '83 Margauxs as well and with all the attention on the '82s, they were a steal upon release.
no avatar
User

R Cabrera

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

654

Joined

Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:14 pm

Location

NYC

Re: TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by R Cabrera » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:36 pm

Jon Peterson wrote:I wish I had a case of the '83 Margauxs as well and with all the attention on the '82s, they were a steal upon release.


Me too.
I have not had many opportuniities to drink Palmer, but of the few that I had, the '83 is the standout.

RC
Ramon Cabrera
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by Tom Troiano » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:22 pm

I think that '83 is, in general, a very underrated Bordeaux vintage. Of course there are some fabulous '82s, '85s, '88s and '89s ('86s still need 50 years) but there were also many very nice wines from '83 and they were cheap because Parker raved about '82, '85 and '86.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Lou Kessler

Rank

Doesn't buy green bananas

Posts

3517

Joined

Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:20 pm

Re: TN: Drappier, Beaucastel, Le Stanze, San Giorgio, Palmer

by Lou Kessler » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:48 pm

Tom Troiano wrote:I think that '83 is, in general, a very underrated Bordeaux vintage. Of course there are some fabulous '82s, '85s, '88s and '89s ('86s still need 50 years) but there were also many very nice wines from '83 and they were cheap because Parker raved about '82, '85 and '86.

Had the 81 Margaux the other night, for some reason Margaux was in another league compared to the other first growths that year. It was great. It was relatively inexpensive when purchased. No such thing as an inexpensive first growth anymore.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Apple Bot, Babbar, ClaudeBot, DotBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Jay Labrador, SemrushBot and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign