The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
-

- User
Matt Richman
- Rank
Wine guru
- Posts
623
- Joined
Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:16 pm
- Location
Brooklyn, NY
by Matt Richman » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:37 pm
Sweet candied cherry core. Pretty, floral. Mellow with a strong middle and a long finish. Some darker notes with tobacco leaf, walnut. Very very nice. Not fading.
B/B+
-

- User
John Treder
- Rank
Zinaholic
- Posts
1940
- Joined
Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:03 pm
- Location
Santa Rosa, CA
by John Treder » Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:21 pm
"Sweet candied cherry core."
In many notes, that would be a harbinger of a strongly negative opinion. Everything else you said was positive. Was it the sweetness that caused you to downgrade a bit?
John
John in the wine county
-

- User
David Glasser
- Rank
Ultra geek
- Posts
112
- Joined
Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:51 am
- Location
Maryland
by David Glasser » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:20 am
Thanks for the note on an old favorite. I always thought this one(and the Geyserville) would last. Tried to save a few but couldn't keep hands off.
This was a pretty ripe wine from the get-go, exhibiting some sweet almost over-ripe notes that were over the top for some.
-

- User
Matt Richman
- Rank
Wine guru
- Posts
623
- Joined
Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:16 pm
- Location
Brooklyn, NY
by Matt Richman » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:20 pm
John - That is a quite respectable score for me, so I don't think I downgraded. A beautiful wine that started out perhaps a bit ripe 15 years ago. I scored this higher than the 93 Pagani and the 93 Lytton. I am far from the expert on old Ridge, however.
-

- User
John Treder
- Rank
Zinaholic
- Posts
1940
- Joined
Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:03 pm
- Location
Santa Rosa, CA
by John Treder » Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:30 pm
I'm no expert on old Ridge, either. It disappears way too quickly.
John
John in the wine county
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch, Jenise and 0 guests