Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35794
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Bob Parsons Alberta. wrote:Bryan wrote.....He knows a friend of mine in Calgary so we hit it off and he opened a 89 (I think) Gardine CdP from his store cellar for me to taste.
Actually Bryan, it was the `95. I found it quite pruney but still drinking fairly nicely. Could have used a tad more fruit perhaps?
Tim York wrote:Hi Bryan,
All this talk of Bandol has has whetted my appetite so I have pulled out a bottle of Pibarnon 98 to go with the Easter lamb. Let's see how that one is drinking. Those EBob notes sound encouraging on the Pradeaux.
Tim
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35794
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:Lamb with some rosemary is heaven with Bandol.
And now you've got me wanting to head for the Rockies again.
Mike B.
Ultra geek
367
Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:56 am
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Fredrik wrote:Tim
From your note is sounds like it was dull and dominated by burnt rubber. This is a very typical note from a old wine in need of decanting. The rubber is then logical from the reduction in bottle and aering could bring forward more flavours.
On the other hand it sounds like typical Pradeaux notes. Never understood the hype of it and even if I have visited the estatet it failed to impress me.
Best
Fredrik Svensson. Luxembourg
Tim York wrote:Here is a TN I posted on this wine nearly 8 years ago.
"Topic: TN: Pradeaux 89; a disappointing Bandol
Author: Tim York
Date: Mon May 1 06:01:22 2000
Accompanied Charolais beef fillet with tapenade (crushed olive) sauce, caviar d''aubergines (a purée of aubergines with atouch of garlic) and brocoli. Both tapenade and aubergines were quite salty.
C: Deep but hints of browining round the edges.
N: Discreet initially somewhat deep and complex but developing bitter crushed grape pip almost burned rubber tinge.
P: Curiously all structure but no fruit and somewhat disjointed. On attack same deep dark impression as initially on nose, then a moment of sharpish acidity and long but dusty and bitter finish again with aromas of crushed grape pips almost burned rubber.
This is a famous property and a very good year so what is going on? Given the difficulty in perceiving any fruit,I find it hard to believe that this will ever show the sumtuous and harmonious qualities of which some experts write. Indeed it shows a lot of symptoms of a wine already on the way down-hill.
HOWEVER
PS on drinking the remainder at the bottom of the bottle this morning both nose and palate were distinctly more harmonious. Still austere and somewhat bitter w hints of oxidisation and little fruit but the crushed grape pip aroma had disappeared and the good length resulted in an agreable and distinguished if staight-laced after taste.
Does this give a clue that the future development may be better that I thought possible yesterday?"
I recall that there was some discussion and advice not to despair because it is not unusual for 15-20 tyears to be required for Pradeaux to open up into its full glory.
I have one bottle left which I have vowed not to touch until its 20th birthday. I will be interested to see what other opinions you get.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests