Bill Spohn wrote:Jenise wrote:Wow, I think this sets a record for posting speed. I've gotta go pour zinfandel for my neighborhood tasting, will post tomorrow!
That's what comes of doing a lunch on a holiday. Hope the wait at the border wasn't too rude for you.
Not at all. The non-Nexus lines were awful, but Vancouver was a ghost town so I sped through what is usually the worst part before one boards 99 at the bottom of Oak, and only had a two-car wait in the Goodie-Two-Shoe lane at the Border. Made a grocery stop on your side and a bank stop on mine, and was still home by 4:30! I wish every Friday was Good Friday!
My notes.
2006 ‘Le G’ de Ch. Guiraud – Grassy lmon nose with a hint of lanolin suggesting semillon amidst the sauv blanc. A bit austere when chilled, but I kept my glass and an hour later, it opened up and showed a lot of complex floral notes and better fruit. A white that rewards decanting!
2002 Bourgogne Hautes Cotes de Nuits – smokey, leesy nose, steely yet elegant. Gets more supple with time--perfect for the smoked trout with pancakes, caper sauce and smoked salmon rosette. And what an amazing rarity--this is a wine for the bucket list!

2000 Triacca Sforzato San Domenico – Sweet, feminine nose but masculine on the palate. Aromatic red fruit with a bit of iron and grippy tannins. A nebbiolo that didn't feel like nebbiolo. Very good.
1991 Sassicaia – what you said. Lovely wine. I didn't realize until later that you'd brought two wines--was the other a backup in case this was dead?
1970 Ch. Montlabert – Again, what you said, though I would add that I wouldn't have banked on this wine holding up much longer in the glass. The finish got parchier as we sipped it. Interesting back story on this one too, that the winery was once owned by a bunch of Vancouverites and that at one time, this and Pontet Canet were the only Bordeauxs you could buy around town!
1997 Ch. Montrose – I don't disagree with your description, but I should go fetch my TN's from the bottle Bob and I opened a month ago, because that bottle would show why I brought this bottle to lunch: not that this bottle wasn't good, but the other was much more evolved than this and much more expressive. It also suggests that a little more aging will be a benefit. Of course, now I have a dilemna for the one remaining bottle that I have: is it more like A or B?
1998 Griffin Creek Merlot Syrah – Nose of wet dog! On the palate, cola and stewed fruit. A fun oddity.
1997 JL Chave St. Joseph – What you said.
1998 Ch. Ferraud – Nice but nondescript nose, flavorless palate. Eh.
1984 Caymus Special Selection – Rusty color, and my glass was a bit cloudy. Rather monotone and lacks the sweet finish of a California cabernet, definitely past its prime.
2000 Penfolds Bin 389 – "rather nice to see this as I have a case stashed (somewhere…)." Of course you do.

Excellent 389--minty nose with good cabernet attributes and structure. I hope my 96's are as good as this.
1997 BR Cohn Olive Hill Cabernet – The nose here was more like a Cornas than a California cabernet with sweet cherry and flowers, but it was very Sonoma on the palate. Very very pleasant, but what it lacks is the reason I've never bought BR Cohn wines, though I've tasted them many times.