The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2002 Burgundy wine session

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Michael K

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

570

Joined

Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:13 pm

Location

Wellesley, MA, USA

WTN: 2002 Burgundy wine session

by Michael K » Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:52 pm

I was in SF so a bunch of friends invited me over to their place. In the course of planning this, we decided to have a 2002 burgundy session to see where the wines were. This was an interesting nice with a bunch of enthusiasts. Thanks for the previous suggestions to decant on a post a few weeks ago. You were right, most of the wines were still very tight and needed the air.

(1) Michel Lafarge, Bourgogne Aligote, Raisins Dores: faulty bottle. too bad as this is one of my favourite under $15 burgs.

(2) Laboure-Roi Chassagne-Montrachet: On, first opening, really nice, tight, delineated, citrus, lemon rind, and a tight mineral finish that lasted and lasted but with the high acidity, remained very fresh.

(3) Louis Jadot Savigny-Les-Beaune, La Dominode: The cheap and cheery wine of the evening, fruit, soft, pleasant nose, and a palate of ripe red/dark berries, oak, and a solid tannic and acidity structure behind it. Drinking really well now and I would not hesitate to drain the rest of mine.

(4) ’02 Mommessin Burgundy Beaune 1er: this wine was unfortunately faulty. There was a funky nose that never blew off, but you could sense that behind it there was a bit of strength of fruit and structure and a silkiness to the texture. Unfortunate.

(5) Comte Armand,1er Cru Pommard Clos Des Epeneaux
This wine was like a magic show all night. Every time we returned to it, it showed differently. On opening, lush full, ripe tannic, beef bouillon and smooth, after one hour, better nose, fully breadth of flavours, tannins at side line, after another hour, tightened up entirely, showing nothing but austere wood and tannings, then another 30 minutes showed it opening up again...... Though I love this wine. This one won't be touched again for another few years.

(6) Domaine Forey Pere et Fils Vosne-Romanee: Solid stately nose, not as flamboyant as the later Gevery Chambertain, but more so than the Pommard. Good body, nice structure. Apeared to be very tight and much waiting to be released. Decanted but I never tried it again.

(7) Vincent Girardin, Gevery Chambertain. This was the WOTH. What a great complex nose. The nose alone was worth the price of entry. Initally bacon fat, brown sugar, with a background of ripe red fruits, then layering on top again, tobacco, minerals and then revealing the fruit slightly reserved again. The wine was equally good, with a strong structure behind it, great berries, elegant body, slightly lithe in texture but dense in flavours, retaining th elegance of the body. Very nice and still got some time before trying again.

(8) 2001 Mesmer Spatburgunder Weissherbst. This was the sweet german Pinot Noir Auslese. Unfortunately faulty bottle? or jsut in dumb phase. Just flabby and cloy at this point in time.

(9) Ringer - 2002 The Walther Hansel South Slope which I like and pulled to see the different. while in itself a very good bottle, the designs and purposes of these two wines were so different. Unfortunately with this batch of wines that focused on finesse and complexity, this one didn't really have much of a chance.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Steve Edmunds and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign