I compare $10 Vouvray to $10 Calif Viognier. Lots more choices in the CA stuff, and I've had a couple of bottles of REALLY BAD Vouvray. And a couple of bottles that give me a feeling for what the standard might be. Which a couple of bottles of CA have met.
I do buy NZ SB, and now that it's available, the occasional bottle of NZ PN. And I do like Alsatian wines, though they too have become rather pricey. I fear I just can't get into Riesling.
I'd love to get more Burgundy that's the equal of some of the stuff I had there in 2001, but again, that's really hard to find. I looked down my spreadsheet and found exactly two bottles of sub-$20 Burgundy. One I liked - Edmond Cornu Ladoix "Les Carrieres" 2000 that I brought home from my trip (cost me $11.78) and one ho-hum - Robert Groffier Bourgogne 2000 at $18.99, and my note was, "A very pleasant wine of no particular distinction."
When I pay (gasp, shudder) $40 for a bottle of wine, I hope to be rewarded with something memorable. Yes, I know there are wines that cost a ton or more. I'm just not in that market. I've never paid as much as $100 for a bottle of wine, but inflation keeps inflating and one of these days I'm sure I will, but my expectations then will be about the same as my expectations now for a $30 - $40 bottle - something worth remembering and remarking about.
You may consign me to the "cheap old fuddy-duddy" bin. I don't mind.
