The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Château Bouscassé 97 basic and VV compared.

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

WTN: Château Bouscassé 97 basic and VV compared.

by Tim York » Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:39 am

Madiran AOC - Château Bouscassé 1997 – Alain Brumont – Alc. 12.5%.

This is the basic cuvée. I wrote on the Vieilles Vignes 1997 cuvée last October and, re-reading the notes of that, I could almost write the same here. This was the VV –

"Château Bouscassé AOC Madiran Vieilles-Vignes 1997"

"It is the charm of the occasional smile of an austere, rugged and upright country gentleman. But I have never seen him smile before in other vintages."

"C: Very dense. N: Well developed with strong notes of wet leather and a background of ripe acidic plum and some raspberry. P: Fully open with good body and “gras”, lots of dark fruit like damsons (but even some hints of "sweetness"), quite ripe tannic structure with a broadening and crescendo to the rear of palate and long diminuendo thereafter. Aromas are as on the nose with a touch meat and acidity is marked but appealing with a touch of minerality. A fine wine, 17,5/20, which went beautifully with rare steak and a rich périgordine sauce."

"This is the first time I have glimpsed some hedonism in a Madiran and I am tempted to put it down to that ubiquitously “easy” vintage, 1997. And at barely 10 years old it is young for a Bouscassé VV to be showing expressively. Of course, really macho Madiran enthusiasts may mark it down for these reasons."

So what were the differences in the basic cuvée?

In the aromas, I didn’t get any raspberry here but the plum was more forward and the wet leather was perhaps even more marked. On the palate, I could hardly talk of “sweetness” and, though far from short, “long diminuendo” no longer comes to mind. The overall impression is slightly more rugged but still a fine gutsy wine; 16.5/20.

I have eleven more bottles left. Yum!
Tim York
no avatar
User

Saina

Rank

Musaroholic

Posts

3976

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Location

Helsinki, Finland

Re: WTN: Château Bouscassé 97 basic and VV compared.

by Saina » Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:03 pm

Tim York wrote:The overall impression is slightly more rugged but still a fine gutsy wine; 16.5/20.

I have eleven more bottles left. Yum!


Lucky you! I don't have any left. I love the ruggedness of youngish Madirans so I can never keep my hands off them, even though I should know better since I love older Madirans also. :oops: Do you have a source there that has the '97 or thereabouts vintage available? Would you care to name the source? I really need to stock up on Madirans...

The more I've compared Montus vs. Montus Préstige vs. Bouscassé VV vs. Bouscassé, the more I tend to prefer the basic Bouscassé. It isn't (or wasn't - some recent reports have me a bit worried, but I haven't tasted any post-'99) as oaky and to my tastes therefore the Madiran character comes across clearer.

-O
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: WTN: Château Bouscassé 97 basic and VV compared.

by Tim York » Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:27 pm

Otto,

I've had these bottles for quite a few years but they were buried under others in a bin. There is, however, a merchant in Belgium, Justin Monard Pro Vino, who has quite a stock of Brumont wines. He was discounting a lot of them over the year end but I think the offer has now terminated http://www.justinmonardprovino.be/conte ... cpage=home .

I wasn't bothered by the wood on the VV 97 but this may have changed in recent vintages.
Tim York

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Ripe Bot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign