The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Wink Lorch

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:16 pm

Location

London/France

More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Wink Lorch » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:20 am

Following on from Tim York's post earlier this week, it has just emerged that the French courts have ruled against Le Parisien newspaper regarding an article about Champagne, declaring that it should have included the obligatory health warning message that alcohol advertisements carry in France following the Loi Evin. Decanter have run a piece on it, which has an amusing comment from Howard G Goldberg.
http://www.decanter.com/news/173401.html

What they are in effect saying is that "journalism = advertising" when it comes to alcohol. How absolutely ridiculous!
Wink Lorch - Wine writer, editor and educator
http://winetravelmedia.com and http://jurawine.co.uk
Also http://www.winetravelguides.com
no avatar
User

Wink Lorch

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:16 pm

Location

London/France

Petition on the above

by Wink Lorch » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:06 am

For those of you who read French and care about this issue, FIJEV (Fédération Internationale des Journalistes & Ecrivains du Vin et des Spiritueux) has launched a petition to refute the ruling of the court.
http://www.mesopinions.com/detail-petition.php?ID_PETITION=93594eb393073731a0ae64dcc742d7bd
Sorry, haven't got time to translate it right now, maybe later if anyone is interested. :?:
Wink Lorch - Wine writer, editor and educator
http://winetravelmedia.com and http://jurawine.co.uk
Also http://www.winetravelguides.com
no avatar
User

AlexR

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

806

Joined

Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:28 am

Location

Bordeaux

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by AlexR » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:56 am

Wink Lorch,

You're on the ball because this only came out today in the French newspapers.

What it amounts to is the importation of political correctness from the States taken to a ridiculous extreme...

I hope they appeal and overturn the decision.

Best regards,
Alex R.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35783

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by David M. Bueker » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:52 am

AlexR wrote:
What it amounts to is the importation of political correctness from the States taken to a ridiculous extreme...


We haven't gone that far yet. Newspaper articles on wine do not carry health warnings.

Of course most news in the USA should come with a mental health warning: read/watch this & you'll go crazy.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21847

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Robin Garr » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:11 am

AlexR wrote:What it amounts to is the importation of political correctness from the States

Oh, come now, Alex. Blame us for McDonald's if you must, but this silliness is home-grown. :roll:
no avatar
User

Simon J

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

56

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:40 am

Location

Quebec City

Translation

by Simon J » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:12 am

Wink Lorch wrote:For those of you who read French and care about this issue, FIJEV (Fhttp://www.wineloverspage.com/forum/vi ... &p=110382#
:arrow:édération Internationale des Journalistes & Ecrivains du Vin et des Spiritueux) has launched a petition to refute the ruling of the court.
http://www.mesopinions.com/detail-petition.php?ID_PETITION=93594eb393073731a0ae64dcc742d7bd
Sorry, haven't got time to translate it right now, maybe later if anyone is interested. :?:


I am busy procrastinating, avoiding doing what I should be doing. As a result, voila, here is a rough translation:

The International Federation of wine and spirit journalists and writers (FIJEV) replied to the decision of the tribunal;

We strongly rebuke the analysis of the tribunal that sides with the erroneous assertions of the National Association for the prevention of alcoholism and addiction (ANPAA):" all communications that promote alcoholic beverages, such as the series of articles on Champagne, are considered as publicity and fall under the code of public health"

Our profession is not to make sales. We don't issue press releases or advertisements, but inform. We contribute towards quality education and do not promote consumption.

This judicial decision should be reversed. Please help us in our case.

We are waiting for your messages. A petition could be the first step while waiting for a civil constitutional appeal process. We wish to back up our Parisienne colleagues, not because of 'esprit du corp' or self-interest, but for a just cause


I hope I did not screw it up too badly, but I think I caught the gist of the announcement.

Simon
no avatar
User

Wink Lorch

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:16 pm

Location

London/France

Procrastination

by Wink Lorch » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:22 am

Thanks for that, Simon - I hope lots of people sign it. :roll:

Procrastination = saving your best bottles until after your guests have gone home. :wink:
Wink Lorch - Wine writer, editor and educator
http://winetravelmedia.com and http://jurawine.co.uk
Also http://www.winetravelguides.com
no avatar
User

Simon J

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

56

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:40 am

Location

Quebec City

Re: Procrastination

by Simon J » Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:41 am

Wink Lorch wrote: Procrastination = saving your best bottles until after your guests have gone home. :wink:


I wish.....except it is 9.30am and too early to get the bottle opener out, if I want to be even a wee bit productive.
BTW would the opposite of procrastination be drinking your best bottles before your guests arrive? :?

Simon
no avatar
User

Paul B.

Rank

Hybrid Guru

Posts

2063

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:38 pm

Location

Ontario, Canada

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Paul B. » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:35 am

David M. Bueker wrote:Of course most news in the USA should come with a mental health warning: read/watch this & you'll go crazy.

That's the best quote I've read in months . . . :mrgreen:
http://hybridwines.blogspot.ca
no avatar
User

Mark Lipton

Rank

Oenochemist

Posts

4523

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:18 pm

Location

Indiana

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Mark Lipton » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:45 pm

Robin Garr wrote:
AlexR wrote:What it amounts to is the importation of political correctness from the States

Oh, come now, Alex. Blame us for McDonald's if you must, but this silliness is home-grown. :roll:


I must disagree, Robin. Fearmongering about alcohol is a time-honored tradition in the US, though in this case it's taken to a new venue. For examples, see the cases of parents whose child custody rights have been challenged for giving a child a sip of alcohol in a public venue. Whether it's imported from the US to France is debatable, but it's been with us for a long, long time now.

Mark Lipton
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Tim York » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:22 pm

Sorry about my slow reaction. My modem has been giving me hell all day and has only just let me connect.

I have signed the petition.

This is another illustration of just how far Public Health Fascism is going.

I hope common sense prevails in the appeal court.

This particular manifestation springs from French terroir (Robespierre type intransigence) but I do believe that in developing the underlying anti-alcohol (and anti-tobacco) stance there is a lot of interaction between nations, much as the French would hate to admit to sensitivity to foreign, especially American, influence. As I have said elsewhere, the pseudo-religious angle is thankfully absent in Europe.
Tim York
no avatar
User

Ian Sutton

Rank

Spanna in the works

Posts

2558

Joined

Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:10 pm

Location

Norwich, UK

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Ian Sutton » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:45 pm

To be honest, reading most wine magazine articles, it's difficult to determine after you've finished whether it was indeed advertising. Better to work on increasing (wine) journalistic integrity IMO
Drink coffee, do stupid things faster
no avatar
User

Hoke

Rank

Achieving Wine Immortality

Posts

11420

Joined

Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am

Location

Portland, OR

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Hoke » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:14 pm

Randy R wrote:Actually this brings up an interesting question about book and movies like James Bond (where much is made of his ordering martinis) or the heavy beer drinking movies. Will they need to flash on the screen "alcohol consumption.." warnings? Totally nuts.

Please everyone go to the petition link Wink provided and fill in as follows:

1st field Nom: your LAST name only
Nationalité: Your country
Profession:
email: use a throwaway, I don't know the mesopinions site but I never trust sites like this.

Not enough activity on this petition. Need more international support. They say only first names are visible (and you don't have to give one).


Would that make this link the winkest link?
no avatar
User

Wink Lorch

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:16 pm

Location

London/France

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Wink Lorch » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:25 pm

Hoke wrote:Would that make this link the winkest link?


:wink: :wink: :lol:
Wink Lorch - Wine writer, editor and educator
http://winetravelmedia.com and http://jurawine.co.uk
Also http://www.winetravelguides.com
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11774

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Dale Williams » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:29 pm

Mark Lipton wrote:I must disagree, Robin. Fearmongering about alcohol is a time-honored tradition in the US, though in this case it's taken to a new venue. For examples, see the cases of parents whose child custody rights have been challenged for giving a child a sip of alcohol in a public venue. Whether it's imported from the US to France is debatable, but it's been with us for a long, long time now.

Mark Lipton


I don't think Robin was in any sense claiming that US is immune to this, just that it was a bit much to blame US for this ruling in France. Not that anything would stop Alex.
no avatar
User

Wink Lorch

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:16 pm

Location

London/France

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Wink Lorch » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:33 pm

Randy R wrote:Please everyone go to the petition link Wink provided and fill in as follows:

1st field Nom: your LAST name only
Nationalité: Your country
Profession:
email: use a throwaway, I don't know the mesopinions site but I never trust sites like this.

Not enough activity on this petition. Need more international support. They say only first names are visible (and you don't have to give one).


Sorry, did not react to this earlier.
Randy, you can't use a throw-away email because they send an email, which you have to click on to verify it.

Prénom = first name and It's true that only first names are visible together with any comment you make. If you click on "Voir la liste des signatures" you can see them - I think it looks better than a blank. You can leave comments for publication too.

The most annoying thing about the site is that they say you can email other people by giving their addresses in the normal way, but if you do this they get an email that seems like junk, so it's better to send the link onto people personally.
Wink Lorch - Wine writer, editor and educator
http://winetravelmedia.com and http://jurawine.co.uk
Also http://www.winetravelguides.com
no avatar
User

AlexR

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

806

Joined

Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:28 am

Location

Bordeaux

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by AlexR » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:00 pm

Dale,

I believe if you actually thought about it, you'd see my point.

This ruling is out of kilter with French culture, and as several people on the thread have pointed out, there *is* probably an influence from the American neo-prohibitionism movement.

Another example of an American-type aberration in French culture is this from today's paper:
http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualites/2008/ ... t-food.php
People simply didn't do things like this before, and the parallel with the famous case of the lady who spilled coffer over herself at a Mc Donalds and successfully sued for a large amount of money is flagrant.

Best regards,
Alex R.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21847

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Robin Garr » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:42 pm

Mark Lipton wrote: Whether it's imported from the US to France is debatable, but it's been with us for a long, long time now.

That was my point, Mark. Alex seemed to be suggesting that France was merely copying modern American labeling hysteria. I think not.

(As I understand it, moreover, we got our "Temperance" attitudes from the same source as our more defensible Abolitionism in the age of slavery: We imported it from England.)
no avatar
User

Mike Filigenzi

Rank

Known for his fashionable hair

Posts

8229

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm

Location

Sacramento, CA

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Mike Filigenzi » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:09 pm

So if I'm a French scientist and I do research showing that drinking wine has a positive health effect, will I have to put a health warning in the article when I get it published in a journal? One would think so if "all communications that promote alcoholic beverages" require this.

Exceedingly stupid stuff here.
"People who love to eat are always the best people"

- Julia Child
no avatar
User

Mark Lipton

Rank

Oenochemist

Posts

4523

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:18 pm

Location

Indiana

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Mark Lipton » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:13 am

Robin Garr wrote:(As I understand it, moreover, we got our "Temperance" attitudes from the same source as our more defensible Abolitionism in the age of slavery: We imported it from England.)


Yup, though it's fair to point out that the Protestant nonconformists (aka Puritans) weren't limited to England, being also found in the Netherlands and with similar trends in the Lutheran splinter groups in Scandinavia. I find much to admire as well as to criticize in those religious sects: their emphasis on good deeds in the here-and-now, their work ethic, their opposition to slavery. In fact, the Friends (Quakers) to this day have a pretty admirable social agenda. It's fair to say, though, that their anti-hedonism would spell the end of any association I could have with them.

Mark Lipton
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Tim York » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:43 am

Mark Lipton wrote:
Robin Garr wrote:(As I understand it, moreover, we got our "Temperance" attitudes from the same source as our more defensible Abolitionism in the age of slavery: We imported it from England.)


Yup, though it's fair to point out that the Protestant nonconformists (aka Puritans) weren't limited to England, being also found in the Netherlands and with similar trends in the Lutheran splinter groups in Scandinavia. I find much to admire as well as to criticize in those religious sects: their emphasis on good deeds in the here-and-now, their work ethic, their opposition to slavery. In fact, the Friends (Quakers) to this day have a pretty admirable social agenda. It's fair to say, though, that their anti-hedonism would spell the end of any association I could have with them.

Mark Lipton


We Brits can take a lot of the blame (credit, if you prefer) for the development of Puritanism and particularly for its export to America. Strong kill-joy, even kill-king, attitudes developed in the 17th Century but some who found the home turf insufficiently receptive emigrated. In a sense we were lucky to have a short period of Puritan misrule by Oliver Cromwell which caused a national revulsion, even though quite a lot of puritan influenced attitudes, some good, some bad, continued to linger under the surface. As you rightly say, deeply protestant culture flourished for a long time in the Netherlands, Scandinavia and parts of Germany, but let us not blame Luther for the excesses. Is he not attributed with the saying "he who loves not wine, woman and song is a fool all life long"? (Is it an accident that a binge drinking culture flourishes in most of these Protestant areas?)

Let us not forget that Calvin was a Frenchman who set up a puritan "paradise" in Geneva. I think that on the whole the Huguenots in France were more pragmatic than Calvin while conserving their essential convictions, but that did not prevent their expulsion by a Catholic king. I believe that some of the prominent Bordelais wine families are protestant.

Europeans nowadays are overwhelmingly secular although historical cultural attitudes continue to have an influence (e.g. drink rules in Scandinavia). In France there are no traditional kill-joy attitudes in the gastronomic field; rather the reverse. I wonder if this does not, in part, explain the virulence of French Public Health fascists who may feel that they have to kill an existing culture in order to erect a new healthy utopia.
Tim York
no avatar
User

AlexR

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

806

Joined

Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:28 am

Location

Bordeaux

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by AlexR » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:30 am

Hi,

Blame the English and the Europeans for slavery, yes (in fact, a lot of those who slaughtered the American Indians were from the Old World too)..
But "temperance"? Sure, certain religious sects in England banned alcoholic consumption, but never was this outlawed by the government!

There has been a smoking ban in France for 11 days. You can't even light up in a bar.
This journalist from the LA Times (a non-smoker) regrets the ban, largely attributed to American influence
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la- ... -rightrail

I see that the jury is out on WLDG as to whether America actually plays a role in these movements.

We each have our own perspective. I see things from abroad and Dale, for instance, sees things from one of America's most sophisticated and cosmopolitan cities.
As always, the truth is probably somewhere in-between what we all say :-).

Best regards,
Alex R.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21847

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Robin Garr » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:53 am

Mark Lipton wrote:Yup, though it's fair to point out that the Protestant nonconformists (aka Puritans) weren't limited to England, being also found in the Netherlands and with similar trends in the Lutheran splinter groups in Scandinavia.

Well, yeah, but we tend to conflate two historical trends when we speak of "Puritanism." Certainly the Puritans (and the Quakers) were as you say, "anti-hedonistic." Nice word. :)

But if I'm not mistaken, aggressive, evangelical Prohibitionism was a creature of the 19th century, not the 17th, and was spurred into action by drunkenness among London's poor, but soon found a receptive new home as an "anti-saloon" movement in the US among the Puritans' heirs.
no avatar
User

Thomas

Rank

Senior Flamethrower

Posts

3768

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:23 pm

Re: More ridiculous wine rulings from the French

by Thomas » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:48 am

AlexR wrote:Hi,

Blame the English and the Europeans for slavery, yes (in fact, a lot of those who slaughtered the American Indians were from the Old World too)..
But "temperance"? Sure, certain religious sects in England banned alcoholic consumption, but never was this outlawed by the government!

There has been a smoking ban in France for 11 days. You can't even light up in a bar.
This journalist from the LA Times (a non-smoker) regrets the ban, largely attributed to American influence
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la- ... -rightrail

I see that the jury is out on WLDG as to whether America actually plays a role in these movements.

We each have our own perspective. I see things from abroad and Dale, for instance, sees things from one of America's most sophisticated and cosmopolitan cities.
As always, the truth is probably somewhere in-between what we all say :-).

Best regards,
Alex R.


No, Alex. The truth is in history, and Robin's got it right.

The American Prohibition movement was inspired by happenings in England and was only successful after it allied with the American Women's Movement, which was also largely British inspired. The vast difference is that in America the prohibition movement succeeded politically--after 85 years of pushing.

What's going on in Europe and in America is not a nationalistic problem, it's a moralism attitude that has been with all humans, and likely always will be.

Never blame "them;" that's the way toward both rabid nationalism and blind complacency; it's always us!

There, you've taken me--briefly--out of retirement. I am procrastinating, and the Internet is the best place I know to do that. I also wanted to use the new system at least once.
Thomas P
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Ripe Bot, td bot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign