To continue the discussion; the Prädikatswein system is built on lies and misleading consumers. Take Kabinett for example. A lot of consumers have been led to believe that Kabinett is the very first harvest that is made from a vineyard with multiple selections. This is hardly ever the case. In fact, Kabinett is very often the last harvest collected. Kabinett is made from the bunches left on the vine to ripen further after the main harvest of Spätlese and botrytis infected Auslese has been collected. If those bunches destined for Kabinett don't reach the minimum Oechsle, they are labeled Qualitätswein (are maybe or maybe not chaptalized). In this case, another fuder or tank of Spätlese will simply be declassified to Kabinett and customers will complain that their Kabinett tastes like Spätlese because of course it is. What should Kabinett be called if it is harvested later than the late-harvest?
David M. Bueker wrote:I once spent a couple of hours with Nik Weis (St. Urbans Hof) debating the flaws in the German wine law. One thing we completely agreed on was that the pradikats need not just lower limits, but upper limits as well, so that consumers stand a chance of buying what they expect.
The problem with setting maximum Oechsle limits for the prädikats is that the producers aren't harvesting specifically for Kabinett, they produce it to fill a price-point and it ends up being simply the wine with the lowest Oechsle available that still qualifies. In botrytis rampant years, the negative selection of botrytis infected bunches is even harder to control and you end up getting Kabinett that is Auslese in reality. This is the reason why there is no such thing as 'true' Kabinett. It's become an afterthought and a moving target in the Mosel.
Cheers,
Bill