The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Edmunds St. John recommendations

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Doug Surplus

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1106

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:17 am

Location

Phoenix AZ

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by Doug Surplus » Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:21 am

David M. Bueker wrote:
Steve Edmunds wrote:Oh, that's just so crass... ( :wink: )


Ain't that the truth. The font size wasn't nearly big enough. Try this:

BUY EDMUNDS ST JOHN WINE IMMEDIATELY!!!


I'm getting the strangest desire to buy some Edmunds St John wine right away! :)
Doug

If God didn't want me to eat animals, why did He make them out of meat?
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11880

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by Dale Williams » Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:48 pm

Sam Platt wrote:I propose that the subject wines be presented in random order with varietal, producer, and vintage made known to tasters before the blind tasting begins. No notes allowed. The blind tasting would then consist of a flight of seven wines, of the same varietal, and similar region (e.g. Bordeaux) from different producers. Vintage should be within a few years of each other, but does not necessarily have to be exactly the same. The tasters would be asked to identify the producer of the wines.

The second blind flight would be a single varietal, from the same producer, but from different vintages. The tasters would be asked to identify the vintage of each wine. The seven wines should be chosen from a span of 15 sequential vintage years. In other words, no 1947 Las Cases up in the same flight as a 2005 Las Cases. The third blind flight would then be seven different red varietals. No blends allowed. The tasters would be asked to identify the varietal.
.


I don't think that my SOBER group would be interested (we're more into tasting good wines), but I could probably get some folks interested. But "neither favoring or fooling" would be inherently tough. Hard not to do one or the other. What is fairness, choosing radically different producers, or is that favoring? Isn't picking similar producers an attempt at fooling tasters? As to varietal wines, you'd have to do multiple producers (I know of no one who makes 7 different reds, though there might be one) so there's a variable. Even vintages- say we did do Bordeaux. Do you include super weak vintages? Would be favoring tasters. Anyway, if anyone wants to organize in metro area, I'd be game. I've made enough bad guesses at blind tasting to have nothing to lose. :)
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by David M. Bueker » Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:53 pm

Dale Williams wrote:I know of no one who makes 7 different reds, though there might be one


Horton from Virginia. Unfortunately they suck.

I bet there are some Cali wineries that come close with Cab, Merlot, Zin, Petite, Syrah, Pinot and maybe something else.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Sam Platt

Rank

I am Sam, Sam I am

Posts

2330

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm

Location

Indiana, USA

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by Sam Platt » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:02 am

Dale William wrote:Anyway, if anyone wants to organize in metro area, I'd be game. I've made enough bad guesses at blind tasting to have nothing to lose.

Dale,

I would be happy to develop a formal protocol that would be relatively simple to implement, and would be glad to discuss logistics issues with you. I can also create a data collection spreadsheet and complete the data analysis myself. If you can find tasters in your area who are game we can protect their identity if that is concern. I am interested in the statistical outcome, not in embarrassing anyone. Also, I would be happy to have my hypothesis proven wrong.

Let me know and I can forward a draft proposal.
Sam

"The biggest problem most people have is that they think they shouldn't have any." - Tony Robbins
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36011

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by David M. Bueker » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:15 am

Sam - I would be game to try as well.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11880

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by Dale Williams » Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:47 pm

sounds good. Happy to organize. Happy to be public, though could do anonymous if majority prefers. More when not on netbook!
no avatar
User

Sam Platt

Rank

I am Sam, Sam I am

Posts

2330

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm

Location

Indiana, USA

Re: Edmund St. John recommendations

by Sam Platt » Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:12 pm

Dale,

I will write up a draft protocol for review. I will post it in a separate thread for comment.
Sam

"The biggest problem most people have is that they think they shouldn't have any." - Tony Robbins
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, iphone swarm and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign