Ian Fitzsimmons wrote:We've long admired Linden's whites, including the '99 hardscrabble cited in the article, plus he makes an impressive dessert wine. Barboursville '04 Cab Fran is exceptional, and their nebbiolo is very good. Naked Mountain - not mentioned in the article - can also make terrific chardonnay in good years, which improves for several years. We've had an impressive natural yeast chardonnay from Piedmont in the past year, though overpriced. Chrysalis and Norton have not been impressive, in my experience, though I know Norton has a loyal constitutency. We've also had surpisingly decent pinot Noir from Afton.
Jim Law seems to be the most inspired and artisinal winemaker, and he has a great business model (he is also a former Peace Corps Volunteer); Barboursville has the most professional organizational approach. Quality and consistency around the state generally, though, is still at an early stage, IMHO.
Ian, your comments are right on the money. I like the Norton, but I find the Chrysalis to be uneven. I tend to favor the Horton. Barboursville is probably the model most wineries should follow. It's a very professional outfit (of course there is some cash there) and I think there are some others such as Prince Michel that are following in their footsteps. I think that the foothills of Virginia, and in fact the entire Blue Ridge, hold a lot of promise. It's exciting to be in the area at the beginning.