by Bob Ross » Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:53 pm
Status Report:
In thinking about this experiment, I've realized that the most important finding was that TCA had a significantly adverse effect on the taste of the food as well as on the aroma and taste of the wine. This finding was so striking that there is no need to repeat the experiment (and the taste of TCA was so unpleasant that I'm not tempted to repeat the experiment for hedonistic reasons).
I'm not sure exactly how TCA does this -- I tasted the TCA but I don't think it over-whelmed the tastes of the food in the way, say, too much salt might over-whelm the taste of food. Instead, the TCA seemed to significantly interfere with my ability to taste many of the flavors in the food.
Hypothesis: TCA may reduce my ability to smell and taste food and wine, even if I can't detect the smell or taste of TCA itself.
In other words, TCA may act in a negative way in the same way salt does in a positive way.
Janet can't have salt in her food, but for some dishes she finds a little bit essential -- in particular a favorite chicken stew. The trick is to add enough salt to brighten the tastes of the stew, without being able to actually taste any salt. Janet is a master at doing so -- I can taste the difference between her salted and unsalted versions of the chicken stew -- the salted version is much more delicious -- but I can't taste any salt in the salted version.
If the hypothesis is true, the TCA problem may be much more significant than I've thought in the past.
I might actually be drinking wine containing TCA without knowing it, and getting much less flavor from the food than I would without drinking the wine.
There's some anecdotal support for the hypothesis.
1. We've had a number of discussions over the years on WLDG about wines in which the fruit was more muted than one would expect or desire -- Robin and others have suggested that an non-detectable amount of TCA might have been the cause.
2. Janet and I took a friend to Daniel a couple of weeks ago. At the suggestion of the sommelier, we drank a 2003 Northern Rhone wine, which tasted smoky and lacked -- we thought -- the amount of fruit the sommelier tasted and described in the wine. We all agreed the wine wasn't corked, but we differed on the amount of fruit we were tasting. I've dined at Daniel and its two earlier iterations with great pleasure many times; for the first time, we were all disappointed in the food. I do know that none of us finished our wine. Could an non-detectable amount of TCA in that Northern Rhone have adversely affected our ability to taste the food? Or did Daniel just have an off night?
Darned if I know.
As a next step, when another opportunity arises, I plan to dilute the corked wine with water until I can't smell or taste the TCA, and then drink the diluted wine with a meal. If flavors are adversely affected, the experiment might suggest that the hypothesis has some validity.
Regards, Bob
PS: Just for the record,
The Napa Valley Grille described the tasting flight as follows:
Pinot Noir $13.75
Understated & Elegant
1. 2005 Calera, Pinot Noir, Central Coast
2. 2005 Macmurray, Pinot Noir, California
3. 2004 Jekel, Pinot Noir, Monterey County
Janet and I found the Calera corked; the bartender agreed with us. He told me he had poured three glasses of wine from the corked bottle for other customers -- two tasting glasses of two ounces each and one six ounce glass for drinking (in addition to the eight ounces I purchased). The other three customers didn't complain about the wine.
Did those three customers recognize the corker, and grin and bear it without complaint? Did they not recognize it as a corker, and drink it anyway? I'm sure it must have adversely affected the taste of their wine. Did it affect the flavor of their food in a negative way?
Darned if I know.
More anon. Regards, Bob