The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Victorwine » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:21 pm

I guess it is allowed because France’s AOC is really about “place”, and the undisclosed amount of Auxerrois allows the winemaker to produce a given style of “Pinot Blanc” that is Alsace. This ruling is not a “two-way” thing. (It cannot be applied to Auxerrois labelled wines).

Salute
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:52 pm

If =<15% of anothervariety is allowed ina avrietally labelled wine then why not Auxerrois in P Blanc, and vice versa
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:54 pm

Steve Slatcher wrote:
Peter May wrote:Strangely, in the first document linked to I cannot see Primitivo listed:-
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ ... 01&from=EN

Maybe I am misintrepreting what you say, but it is not listed is because that document pre-dates the one that says Primitivo should be added. I would be nice to have an updated document, but I don't think that is how things work.


No, you're not misinterpreting. I was expressing surprise that Primitivo, such an important variety in Puglia, should have been forgotten to be listed in the firts place.
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Victorwine » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:41 pm

For all Quality wines produced from a Specific Region the regions governing body rules and regulations comes first. If a Bordeaux Chateau decides to label his/her wine as “Cabernet Sauvignon” could it still be classified as an AOC Bordeaux wine?

Salute
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:39 am

Victorwine wrote: . If a Bordeaux Chateau decides to label his/her wine as “Cabernet Sauvignon” could it still be classified as an AOC Bordeaux wine?



I'm not which question what you're asking. There are AOC Bordeaux's that name the grape varieties used, and there are mono-variety AOC Bordeaux
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:59 am

Peter May wrote:No, you're not misinterpreting. I was expressing surprise that Primitivo, such an important variety in Puglia, should have been forgotten to be listed in the firts place.

But there are many missing varieties. Only those with approved synonyms are in the document, and Zinfandel was not allowed then.
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:02 am

Victorwine wrote:If a Bordeaux Chateau decides to label his/her wine as “Cabernet Sauvignon” could it still be classified as an AOC Bordeaux wine?

Yes. It has been allowed for 10-15 years or so. But I don't think that was always the case. Same applies for Pinot Noir and Burgundy.
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:12 am

Peter May wrote:If =<15% of anothervariety is allowed ina avrietally labelled wine then why not Auxerrois in P Blanc, and vice versa

Less that 15% Auxerrois in "Pinot Blanc" labelled wine is certainly absolutely fine as far as the EU is concerned. But according to the Alsace AOC regulations, Alsace Pinot Blanc could be 100% Auxerrois, and in practice it is often is a very large proportion.

I suspect another EU document proclaims that this is legally OK as an exception. Alternatively it might not be allowed, but is nevertheless tolerated.

The vice-versa aspect is not allowed according to the AOC regulations - wine labelled "Auxerrois" must be 100% of that variety - but otherwise would be fine by the EU.
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:15 pm

Steve Slatcher wrote:
Peter May wrote:No, you're not misinterpreting. I was expressing surprise that Primitivo, such an important variety in Puglia, should have been forgotten to be listed in the firts place.

But there are many missing varieties. Only those with approved synonyms are in the document, and Zinfandel was not allowed then.


Yes, I ,issed that first time around, thats what the paragraph 12.1 that refers to the Annex says.

I was led astray by the large number of varieties from other countries (e.g. Spain & Portugal) that are listed in the Annex without synonyms, and under Italy Rosola alone doesn't show a synonym.

Thanks for the info on Alsace regulations. Wasn't so long ago Pinot B was Tokay d'Alsace ...
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:59 pm

See what you mean Peter. It is more confusing than I thought. The text refers to that annex only as a list of approved synonyms, and yet many varieties there do not have a synonym. But neither is it a complete list of allowed varieties.

If you are up for more Alsace variety pedantry, see my blog post of Dec 12th last year. Writing that is what alerted to seeming discrepancies with EU regs.
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:36 am

Thanks, Steve

Your post is very interesting and well written. Indeed, just like all your blog entries.
no avatar
User

Anders Källberg

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

805

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:48 am

Location

Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Anders Källberg » Sun Jan 15, 2017 3:48 pm

Peter May wrote:Thanks for the info on Alsace regulations. Wasn't so long ago Pinot B was Tokay d'Alsace ...


No, that was Pinot gris, wasn't it?

Cheers
/Anders
no avatar
User

Peter May

Rank

Pinotage Advocate

Posts

4043

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am

Location

Snorbens, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Peter May » Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:56 am

Ah, I remember it well :)

Yes, of course.
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Victorwine » Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:47 am

The alsacewine.net web site simply states that in Alsace “Pinot Blanc” instead of representing a grape variety refers to any white wine made without skin-contact from a grape belonging to the Pinot family of grapes or a close relative. Recent DNA research suggests Auxerrois and Chardonnay may be siblings, (like Chardonnay at one time it was known with Pinot attached to it.

Salute
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Remind me again about the origins of zinfandel

by Steve Slatcher » Mon Jan 16, 2017 12:40 pm

Victorwine wrote:The alsacewine.net web site simply states that in Alsace “Pinot Blanc” instead of representing a grape variety refers to any white wine made without skin-contact from a grape belonging to the Pinot family of grapes or a close relative.

Yes I am aware of that, and it is wrong. In fact it was one of several incorrect or misleading statements I found, online and in books, that lead me to write my own guide to Alsace varieties and labelling - based on what the AOC spec actually says.
http://www.winenous.co.uk/wp/archives/9374

It was only after I had finished it that I discovered that Wikipedia is pretty good on the topic too, which confirmed my sanity.
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon, Apple Bot, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch, LACNIC160, SemrushBot, TomHill and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign