
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
45469
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Jenise wrote:Fixed your photo. To not get all that white area, your last intruction should be to select the box called: Place Inline. That takes care of it.
Re the wine, Covert, I was sure hoping that Jim would have a different result, as then I could have more hope for my remaining bottles, but the truth is I'm not surprised based on the last bottle I had, which I reported on, about last summer. I thought it fading then and said as much, but others with more experience (and possibly better provenance on their bottles) expressed disagreement, so I remained in hopes of some improvement. But it's just not there. Not in my bottles, anyway.
James Dietz
Wine guru
1236
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm
Orange County, California
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
45469
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36364
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
James Dietz
Wine guru
1236
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm
Orange County, California
Jenise wrote:@ Jim: now that IS confusing. Wonder if you and I got ours from the same source, and if they were similarly advanced or something? Now wait, though, that doesn't make sense: cgrimes (who is very experienced, I've seen his/her notes many times on CT though I don't know who it is) reports secondary development which you and I didn't see much potential of. Yet our wines aren't cooked or otherwise showing signs of damage.
David M. Bueker wrote:Ok, I am renting a backhoe this weekend (or more likely next) & digging out a bottle of '99 barton. I will report back as soon as I can.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent and 0 guests