Kelly Young wrote:Mark Lipton wrote:Kelly,
From your comments, it sounds like you're still trying to "get" Bordeaux, and this would be one avenue to seeing what a mature bottle is supposed to taste like.
...I'm trying to "get" Bordeaux because I have the feeling that I'm supposed to.
Damn straight you better get Bordeaux, particularly if you want to hang with the Parker and the Power Points Crowd!
Seriously, though, Bordeaux is the basis for many a wine geek's initial cellar, as these wines are damn near indescructable and live for decades, and provide pleasure along the way. For myself, I don't know if I felt I had to 'get' Bordeaux, but knew that many folks smarter than me were laying these down for their grandkids so I thought, 'well, maybe I should, too'. And I have. Since the 1985 vintage. (Yeah, didn't get into wine until then and missed the 82 to my regret). Now I don't regularly
drink Bordeaux, so the stuff tends to pile up, but I've never bought deeply enough that I need worry it will never get drunk...it'll just take time. Since this stuff lasts near forever, I don't worry about it and can pull out something with age when the moment arises. This is a good thing.
If you are seeking the 'aged' status of Bordeaux, this is the route you will need to take as well, but there is no substituting for your own tastes and passions. You'll be able to find some nice wines at $20-35 that should reward cellaring and show the nice patina of age that Bordeaux takes on with years. These days,, my interests have broadeded out and are a bit eclectic, and I only purchase several Bordeaux a year now, so otheres recommendations are better. If you are just beginning, this is a good time to start, as the economy has created bargains in the 2004's and 2006's, even some age-worthy 2005's are being sold down as well. But, as you are down in DC, ask Mark Wessels at Macarthur's to set you up with a bottle that has some aged characteristics on it. They have an extensive selection of older Bordeaux and I'm sure they will help.