David M. Bueker wrote:And the fact that hock and moselle are protected is just ridiculous. I guess the Germans want to make sure they still have those terms available in case they want to modify the wine law to shoot themselves in the other foot (again).
Well, yeah, I'd sure agree with Hock, David.
Might surprise you though that I can sorta see the Moselle, albeit on somewhat spurious terms (but then, consistency is highly overrated, so I get to be inconsistent). Moselle is the French version of Mosel....and there are (although damned few people care about them) wines from the Moselle in Luxembourg. So I guess I could see protecting the name of the river that runs through it, yeah.
But Hock? C'mon, that's kind of silly.
Now I think I'll go out and have a nice dinner with some Berliner Weissbier (that's not from Berlin), some Wiener Schnitzel (that's not from Vienna), some Cheddar (that's not from Cheddar), some Gruyere (that's not from either France or Switzerland), some Potatoes Lyonnaise (that's not from Lyon). Of course, some cold cuts, like Bologna (that's not from Bologna), Salumi Toscana (that's not from Tuscany), and some linguica (that's never even been close to Portugal). For cocktails, we'll have some Scotch (that's not from Scotland), some Bourbon (that's not from Bourbon), and some Gin (that's not from Holland). For after dinner drinks maybe we'll have some Australian Port (that's not from Portugal, oddly enough), or maybe some Australian Tokay (that, again, oddly enough is not from Hungary). Can't decide whether to have dessert be an English Trifle (that's never been trifled with by an Englishman) or Salzburger Tort (sans Salzburger, of course).
And for breakfast tomorrow: umm, Belgian Waffles! (that aren't from Belgian). Unless I can wheedle my wife into making Dutch Babies (neither Dutch, nor babies, thank the FSM).
I sincerely hope no one is offended or misled by any of this.