Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
David M. Bueker wrote:TimMc wrote:
I understand staistics and percentages and I know how to properly utilize them...it is part of my job, you see.
Amazingly enough it has been part of my job for 16 years. What you are doing is classic statistics marketing. I'm done here.
James Roscoe
Chat Prince
11034
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:43 pm
D.C. Metro Area - Maryland
James Roscoe wrote:The dead horse continues to be beat. Tim, you just don't do not know when to give up. You would make General Custer proud, or is that Col. Mustard in the library with the pipe.
Sam Platt
I am Sam, Sam I am
2330
Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm
Indiana, USA
James Roscoe wrote:Let's move along to making fun of Joe P. in his masterful post.
James Roscoe
Chat Prince
11034
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:43 pm
D.C. Metro Area - Maryland
Bob Ross wrote:"Let's move along to making fun of Joe P. in his masterful post. "
James, Link please.
Thanks, Bob
Neil Courtney
Wine guru
3257
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:39 pm
Auckland, New Zealand
David M. Bueker wrote:TimMc wrote:
I understand staistics and percentages and I know how to properly utilize them...it is part of my job, you see.
Amazingly enough it has been part of my job for 16 years. What you are doing is classic statistics marketing. I'm done here.
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
Sam Platt wrote:James Roscoe wrote:Let's move along to making fun of Joe P. in his masterful post.
Well, okay then. However, I'm reserving the right to make fun of anyone who posts a favorable tasting note on any Sancerre.
Neil Courtney wrote:The margin of error has not been mentioned here yet. From what I recall of Statistics, the MoE of 1 in 100 will be much larger than that for 100 in 10,000.
Neil Courtney wrote:David M. Bueker wrote:TimMc wrote:
I understand staistics and percentages and I know how to properly utilize them...it is part of my job, you see.
Amazingly enough it has been part of my job for 16 years. What you are doing is classic statistics marketing. I'm done here.
But this also has nothing to do with Zorks.
So getting back On Topic, to answer somones question about what is a Zork constructed of:
Materials
ZORK is made of three parts. The primary functions of the three components are:
Cap
The polyethylene cap provides a tamper evident clamp that locks the closure onto the CETIE band of a cork mouth bottle.
Foil
The aluminium foil is welded between the inside of the cap to provide an oxygen barrier equivalent to a screw cap.
Plunger
The polyethylene plunger is clipped into the inside of the cap and welded to the foil. The plunger creates the 'pop' on extraction and reseals the bottle after use. The plunger material has been tested by the AWRI and shows no negative affects on the wine.
See http://www.zork.com.au
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
James Roscoe
Chat Prince
11034
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:43 pm
D.C. Metro Area - Maryland
Howie Hart wrote:I've been following this thread through to its death...
Sam Platt
I am Sam, Sam I am
2330
Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm
Indiana, USA
Oliver McCrum wrote:This has to be a joke. You don't like all Sancerre?
Bob Ross wrote:Howie, it's the standard wine bottle -- "The European CETIE is the specification for the finish on the top section of the mouth of the wine bottle; it’s a universal finish and size." From a Q and A on the Zork closure." CETIE is an acronym for Centre Technique International de l'Embouteillage.
Neil Courtney
Wine guru
3257
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:39 pm
Auckland, New Zealand
Howie Hart wrote:I've been following this thread through to its death, but now I have an actual question about a Zork closure. What is a CETIE cork mouth bottle? As a home winemaker, I'm either stuck with real corks or fake corks. Does the Zork require special equipment to seal the bottles and is this method an alternative for a home winemaker?
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8489
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
Neil Courtney wrote:The margin of error has not been mentioned here yet. From what I recall of Statistics, the MoE of 1 in 100 will be much larger than that for 100 in 10,000. I failed Stat Maths II, so what do I know!
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
Sam Platt wrote:Oliver McCrum wrote:This has to be a joke. You don't like all Sancerre?
Oliver, I happened onto to a Sancerre from Domaine Du Nozay a couple of years ago. It had texture, depth, body and was a very enjoyable wine. I thought "Great, I'll try other Sancerre". So it began, my quest for more "good" Sancerre. Thus far it has been quite like a quest for the holy grail. You name the Sancerre producer and I've tried it. With the exeption of the Du Nozay its all been mineral water with a slice of lemon tossed in. I just don't get the style apparently. The local wine huckster quit carrying the Domaine Du Nozay to boot. Therefore I mock all those who profess to enjoy Sancerre... in a good way, of course.
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
34935
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
Sam Platt
I am Sam, Sam I am
2330
Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm
Indiana, USA
Oliver McCrum wrote:Well, Sam, I do wonder whether you've had the good ones. Unless you don't like cooler-climate SBL, of course, which may be the case. I love them.
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot and 0 guests