Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Joe Cz wrote:Joe
michael dietrich
Ultra geek
246
Wed May 10, 2006 5:09 pm
West Linn, Oregon
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
I personally like the St. Clair 2006 better than the 2005. I also think the Marlborough is more intense than their Vicars Choice. I really like the more agressive style.
Joe Cz wrote:Dan,
I think the trend is just towards greater stratification. Nobilo (part of Constellation Brands) has Icon, but they are also behind the Monkey Bay label (US retail abot $10) and another, less expensive label, whose name I am forgetting.
Joe
The Jibe, possibly.
Joe Cz wrote:The Jibe, possibly.
Actually, I had forgotten about that one. That's positioned above Monkey Bay. Fern Leaf--I looked it up--is the brand below.
So the Constellation Brands lineup looks something like this:
Fern Leaf $10
Monkey Bay $11
House of Nobilo Regional Collection $12
The Jibe $15
Kim Crawford $17
House of Nobilo Icon $20
Kim Crawford may have its own production facility, but I think the rest are done through Nobilo.
Sue Courtney wrote:Kim Crawford is still separate at this stage.
Do you get any of the Selaks brands in the US? They are also produced at the Nobilo wineries plus there are other brands which you may not see in the US, e.g. The Favourite, Bach 22 (bach is pronounced batch).
Mark Lipton wrote:Sue Courtney wrote:Kim Crawford is still separate at this stage.
Do you get any of the Selaks brands in the US? They are also produced at the Nobilo wineries plus there are other brands which you may not see in the US, e.g. The Favourite, Bach 22 (bach is pronounced batch).
Sue, I recall Selaks from visit to the House of Nobilo in '01, but have never seen it over here. Wine-searcher shows at least one US retailer carrying the '06 Selaks SB, so it must be imported. My recollection was that it was (more or less) Nobilo's second label. Has that status changed with their acquisition by Constellation?
Mark Lipton
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Dan Smothergill wrote:Looking over the comments, the only imaginable case for the consensus and Asimov's panel being in agreement would be if the panel over-sampled from the lower stratification. One would hope not but we don't know.
It seems to me too that stratification in itself doesn't address the question of whether quality in the products that originally got a foot in the door is lower now (e.g., plain old Saint Clair without any block number). It wouldn't be the first time.
Michael Dietrich thinks the '06 St. Clair is even better than the '05. I defer to him, but wish now that I'd saved some of the '05 for a side by side comparison.
Joe Cz wrote:Dan,
FWIW, I rated the '06 St. Clair higher than the '05 (88 vs 84), but found both those vintages of Wairau Reserve excellent (90).
There may be some validity to your suggestion, but as Hoke pointed out, there could be other factors at play in addition, such as vintage quality and rapid vineyard expansion.
Personally, I find the genre can be rather repetitive and not always that interesting--especially when sitting down to taste through a large number at one sitting as the folks at the NY Times did. That could account for some of Asimov and his panel's negativity.
I applaud labels like Saint Clair that can pick up gold medals from the Vicars Choice to the top of the range Wairau Reserve. Others have their top tier wines but cannot get the quality at lower levels that they need to produce to fulfil demand. Unfortunately sometimes fulfilling demand may compromise quality.
michael dietrich
Ultra geek
246
Wed May 10, 2006 5:09 pm
West Linn, Oregon
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot and 0 guests